It was a 20k jar, and keeping Jelly core aligned with JSTL core is one
of the key points for Jelly being used and adopted.
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 21:46:54 -0400, Hans Gilde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to say that I'm not so thrilled with LoopTagStatus in the head
version of ForEachTag.
I
I have to say that I'm not so thrilled with LoopTagStatus in the head
version of ForEachTag.
I know that it's the standard but it adds yet another library as a
dependency, which is pretty annoying for embedded jelly.
I forget, why not use a clone with identical methods?
Hans
Hi,
It turns out I'm blocked from getting to jira here at work, so I guess I have to
post this patch here. This concerns jelly-150 in jira. I had attempted to fix
the LoopTagStatus feature (which is described in the jira entry), but was
unsuccesful. I played with it a little more, and it seems
How long?
It depends. At least a few days usually until someone gets to it, and
that's if it's all fine and dandy.
Will check it out as soon as I can.
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 05:13:04 -0700, Ben Anderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
It turns out I'm blocked from getting to jira here at work, so
great - thanks!
Dion Gillard wrote:
How long?
It depends. At least a few days usually until someone gets to it, and
that's if it's all fine and dandy.
Will check it out as soon as I can.
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 05:13:04 -0700, Ben Anderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
It turns out I'm blocked from
