I didn't see anything committed?
Anyway, I'm finding other bugs in x:set (with or without patch), but
I'll wait until the newer version to investigate in case it changes.
- Brett
Paul Libbrecht wrote:
Sounds great.
Have just committed...
- more tests
- empty-handling as before
To test, I simply m
Sounds great.
Have just committed...
- more tests
- empty-handling as before
To test, I simply modified
/cache/maven-xdoc-plugin/project.xml to depend on the
latest jelly:xml... and the [] I got were all in some java kind of
code... was this enough test ? I hope... I'm fading away.
Before relea
I'm +1 on the backward compatibility.
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 00:48:52 +1100, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> The patch in r148883 is causing me hassles: I'm getting "[]" (an empty
> list converted to string) when I was expecting "".
>
> I don't really grok this, so I'm not s
Hi Paul,
The patch in r148883 is causing me hassles: I'm getting "[]" (an empty
list converted to string) when I was expecting "".
I don't really grok this, so I'm not sure how it is used enough to debug
it. I'm actually getting the [] back from x:expr (on an attribute in
JSL) and haven't locat
