FWIW I also think the current behaviour is nice and
concise. I wrote a fairly large Jelly switch
statement, and it was nice to not have to write all
those break tags.
--- Rodney Waldhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Given this and the other replies on this thread, I
> guess I'll just leave
> well
Given this and the other replies on this thread, I guess I'll just leave
well enough alone for now.
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, bob mcwhirter wrote:
>
> I think most folks tend to use 'break' with their switch/case statements,
> and probably have been bitten in the ass a lot due to a missing break.
>
>
I think most folks tend to use 'break' with their switch/case statements,
and probably have been bitten in the ass a lot due to a missing break.
I'd vote for defaultly not falling through, but if you wanted to,
add an explicit tag that'd set a fall-through flag
to true and execute the following
