Re: [jexl] I assume that the build.xml came from maven?

2003-02-09 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr .
On Saturday, February 8, 2003, at 08:20 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Geir, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 08/02/2003 10:22:47 AM: Suggestion - might be nice to have a header in it, something like : !-- build.xml generated by maven from project.xml version VERSION

Re: [jexl] I assume that the build.xml came from maven?

2003-02-09 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr .
On Friday, February 7, 2003, at 06:32 PM, bob mcwhirter wrote: Does jexl support div/mod? My experiments suggest not. Or would you consider them not working to be a bug? Yes. Will fix. geir -bob On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: Suggestion - might be nice to have a

[jexl] I assume that the build.xml came from maven?

2003-02-07 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr .
Suggestion - might be nice to have a header in it, something like : !-- build.xml generated by maven from project.xml version VERSION on date -- or something. I guess that I should just go suggest that in maven-land Working on fixing the failing test cases. geir -- Geir Magnusson

Re: [jexl] I assume that the build.xml came from maven?

2003-02-07 Thread bob mcwhirter
Does jexl support div/mod? My experiments suggest not. Or would you consider them not working to be a bug? -bob On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: Suggestion - might be nice to have a header in it, something like : !-- build.xml generated by maven from