On Thursday, February 6, 2003, at 01:49 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Thursday, February 6, 2003, at 03:29 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 02:51 PM, robert burrell donkin
wrote:
i've updated the website.
or downdated :)
Can we either keep it the
From: robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i've updated the website.
jexl's site has some features which are a bit unusual for a maven
generated commons site. it's side bar is an old copy of the main commons
navigation bar. also, it's project.xml does not extend ../project.xml.
i'm not
On Thursday, February 6, 2003, at 03:29 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 02:51 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
i've updated the website.
or downdated :)
Can we either keep it the way it was, like the commons site, or make the
commons site like it? It's a
On Tuesday, February 4, 2003, at 02:06 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
i'm keen to get jexl a proper commons website now that it's been
promoted.
i need to modify a few files in jexl and so i'm going to add myself to
the list of committers unless - that is - someone wants to jump in
with
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 07:55 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
I think the Commons website is slowly gravitating to a project not having
a link to its siblings. So +1 to removing the nav-bar elements linking to
projects.
Are you planning to remove the other elements? Community, Chart etc?
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 07:55 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
I think the Commons website is slowly gravitating to a project not having
a link to its siblings. So +1 to removing the nav-bar elements linking to
projects.
Are you
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 08:14 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 07:55 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
I think the Commons website is slowly gravitating to a project not
having
a link to its siblings. So +1 to
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 02:51 PM, robert burrell donkin
wrote:
i've updated the website.
or downdated :)
Can we either keep it the way it was, like the commons site, or make
the commons site like it? It's a visual shock to switch between them.
jexl's site has some features
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 02:51 PM, robert burrell donkin
wrote:
i've updated the website.
or downdated :)
Can we either keep it the way it was, like the commons site, or make
the commons site like it? It's a visual shock to
i'm keen to get jexl a proper commons website now that it's been promoted.
i need to modify a few files in jexl and so i'm going to add myself to the
list of committers unless - that is - someone wants to jump in with an
objection about now...
- robert
10 matches
Mail list logo
