Re: [jira] Updated: (SCXML-1) [scxml] JUnit tests for SCXML

2006-07-17 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 7/17/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/17/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Except when in bulk mode, when I edit an issue, I see a change in > Bugzilla Id, for example, for SCXML-1 edits notifications: > >Bugzilla Id: (was: 38459) > > Doesn't seem to af

Re: [jira] Updated: (SCXML-1) [scxml] JUnit tests for SCXML

2006-07-17 Thread Henri Yandell
On 7/17/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Except when in bulk mode, when I edit an issue, I see a change in Bugzilla Id, for example, for SCXML-1 edits notifications: Bugzilla Id: (was: 38459) Doesn't seem to affect anything? (I still see the Bugzilla Id link when I browse to

Re: [jira] Updated: (SCXML-1) [scxml] JUnit tests for SCXML

2006-07-17 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 7/17/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/17/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Indeed, this makes sense in general. SCXML-1 is the only issue that is > marked against the Nightly Builds for [scxml] and that goes back to > the intent with which it was created (the

[jira] Updated: (SCXML-1) [scxml] JUnit tests for SCXML

2006-07-17 Thread Rahul Akolkar (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCXML-1?page=all ] Rahul Akolkar updated SCXML-1: -- Bugzilla Id: (was: 38459) Fix Version/s: 0.5 (was: Nightly Builds) > [scxml] JUnit tests for SCXML > - > >

Re: [jira] Updated: (SCXML-1) [scxml] JUnit tests for SCXML

2006-07-17 Thread Henri Yandell
On 7/17/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/17/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd recommend not setting a fix version of Nightly Builds. In fact I'm > in favour of killing that as a version in all components and have done > so in some (Lang doesn't have it for exampl

Re: [jira] Updated: (SCXML-1) [scxml] JUnit tests for SCXML

2006-07-17 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 7/17/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd recommend not setting a fix version of Nightly Builds. In fact I'm in favour of killing that as a version in all components and have done so in some (Lang doesn't have it for example). Eventually you'll want the fix to apply to a release o

Re: [jira] Updated: (SCXML-1) [scxml] JUnit tests for SCXML

2006-07-17 Thread Henri Yandell
I'd recommend not setting a fix version of Nightly Builds. In fact I'm in favour of killing that as a version in all components and have done so in some (Lang doesn't have it for example). Eventually you'll want the fix to apply to a release of some kind. Hen On 7/17/06, Rahul Akolkar (JIRA) <[

[jira] Updated: (SCXML-1) [scxml] JUnit tests for SCXML

2006-07-17 Thread Rahul Akolkar (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCXML-1?page=all ] Rahul Akolkar updated SCXML-1: -- Bugzilla Id: (was: 38459) Fix Version/s: Nightly Builds (was: 0.5) > [scxml] JUnit tests for SCXML > - > >

[jira] Updated: (SCXML-1) [scxml] JUnit tests for SCXML

2006-07-17 Thread Rahul Akolkar (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCXML-1?page=all ] Rahul Akolkar updated SCXML-1: -- Bugzilla Id: (was: 38459) Fix Version/s: 0.5 > [scxml] JUnit tests for SCXML > - > > Key: SCXML-1 >