> every new committer needs to be VOTEd in as per every other
> jakarta subproject.
Oh, OK. My mistake.
I have no problem languishing in Contributor status; it's just more
convenient to commit changes directly to CVS than to make a patch (and
bother someone else to incorporate it).
- A
From: "Steven Caswell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: Alex Chaffee / Purple Technology [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 04:05:09PM -0500, Steven Caswell wrote:
> > > I think "bisect" is good since it explicitly means "two
> > > parts" rather than "split" which returns many parts.
>
On Sunday, March 9, 2003, at 08:08 PM, Alex Chaffee / Purple Technology
wrote:
* abbreviate
OK! How about I add this one myself? I'm a Tomcat committer; whom do
I ask to add me to the karma list for commons? (I think I heard that
Tomcat committers don't need a confirmation vote.)
FYI
(until
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Chaffee / Purple Technology [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 4:25 PM
> To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List'
> Subject: Re: [lang] Summarising Purple Was: [lang] Adding
> Purple to StringUtils
>
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 04:05:09PM -0500, Steven Caswell wrote:
> > I think "bisect" is good since it explicitly means "two
> > parts" rather than "split" which returns many parts.
>
> Wouldn't "removeFromLast" describe the action more succiently than
> "bisect" or "divide"?
"from" is ambiguous.
See below...
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Chaffee / Purple Technology [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 3:09 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [lang] Summarising Purple Was: [lang] Adding
> Purple to StringUtils
&g
* abbreviate
OK! How about I add this one myself? I'm a Tomcat committer; whom do
I ask to add me to the karma list for commons? (I think I heard that
Tomcat committers don't need a confirmation vote.)
* integrate truncateNicely and abbreviate
This I'd have to do research on; probably shoul
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 1) Add abbreviate(), merging StringTaglib truncateNicely functionality in
> > if different.
> +1
>
> > 2) strdiff/strdiffat functionality added, under the names:
> > differentText and differentAt.
> +1
From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 1) Add abbreviate(), merging StringTaglib truncateNicely functionality in
> if different.
+1
> 2) strdiff/strdiffat functionality added, under the names:
> differentText and differentAt.
+1
were these the suggested names?
> 3) camelCaseToUnderscore. Con
So, summarising the purple thread:
1) Add abbreviate(), merging StringTaglib truncateNicely functionality in
if different.
2) strdiff/strdiffat functionality added, under the names:
differentText and differentAt.
3) camelCaseToUnderscore. Consider addition of this method. I'm tempted to
think
essage-
> From: Steve Downey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 9:06 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [lang] Adding Purple to StringUtils
>
>
> From: "Steven Caswell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To
From: "Steven Caswell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Jakarta Commons Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 4:54 PM
Subject: RE: [lang] Adding Purple to StringUtils
> I mostly agree with Hen
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 1:53 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [lang] Adding Purple to StringUtils
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Alex Chaffee / Purple Technology wrote:
>
> > I'll list t
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 01:52:42PM -0500, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> > * String strdiffVerbose(String expected, String actual)
> >
> > Compare two strings, and return a verbose description of how
> > they differ. Shows a window around the location to provide
> > context.
> >
> > E.g. strdiffVerbose(
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Alex Chaffee / Purple Technology wrote:
> I'll list these independently, so we can start haggling over
>
> 1. yea or nay
> 2. naming
> 3. API / method signature
> 4. appropriate package (if lang.StringUtils is not the right place)
Seems good.
> for each in turn. Naturally,
For many years, I've published my personal source code libraries as
open source. By far the most heavily-downloaded class was Utils.java,
containing my string processing routines. I'm psyched that Jakarta
Commons now exists, and I'd like to donate my code to
Lang.StringUtils.
You can see the cod
16 matches
Mail list logo
