Henri Yandell wrote:
Siblings sometimes have to depend on each other, but it's the same type of
dependency as inter-project dependencies.
Allowing for a single class to be copy and pasted is too much though.
I agree with the above part.
I don't see how that simply making this statement is
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 5:24 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [lang] Re: cvs commit:
jakarta-commons/lang/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang Validate.java
I'm confused -- why shouldn't
-arguments to this viewpoint.
Hen
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Tim O'Brien wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 5:24 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [lang] Re: cvs commit:
jakarta-commons/lang/src/java/org
On 1 Jun 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
scolebourne2004/06/01 14:25:35
Modified:lang/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang Validate.java
Log:
Ensure Validate has no inter-lang dependencies
I'm confused -- why shouldn't a class in [lang] have dependencies to
other classes in [lang]?
I'm confused -- why shouldn't a class in [lang] have dependencies to
other classes in [lang]? Isn't this taking things too far??
Its part of [lang] being broad and shallow. In effect, [lang] is a loose
grouping of APIs in a similar vein. As such it should be easily broken into
many parts.
ie.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Heuer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Michael
Heuer
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 15:10
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [lang] Re: cvs commit: jakarta-
commons/lang/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang Validate.java
On 1 Jun 2004 [EMAIL
Gary Gregory wrote:
Sorry for the flame but this is a 'shake-my-head-in-disbelief' moment
that I find discouraging.
I pretty much agree, but from my POV [lang] stopped moving forward a
while ago anyway. Most new requests
or ideas are rejected as out of scope (which is usually valid), and
the
On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 10:54, Gary Gregory wrote:
I agree with Michael.
When did this become is this a design goal? I am against it. :-(
It is one thing to say, I'll cut and paste [lang] code /into/ my own
project, and yes, I know about duplicating code, not getting bug fixes,
etc.
It
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, matthew.hawthorne wrote:
Gary Gregory wrote:
Sorry for the flame but this is a 'shake-my-head-in-disbelief' moment
that I find discouraging.
I pretty much agree, but from my POV [lang] stopped moving forward a
while ago anyway. Most new requests
I believe this is
