Re: [logging] JCL 1.1 FC available for final checks

2006-05-14 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Sun, 2006-05-14 at 11:10 +0200, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > robert burrell donkin wrote: > > On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 20:18 +0200, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > >> robert burrell donkin wrote: > > minotaur is now back up but i deleted the files yesterday. they are now > > in their final locations. once

Re: [logging] JCL 1.1 FC available for final checks

2006-05-14 Thread Dennis Lundberg
robert burrell donkin wrote: On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 20:18 +0200, Dennis Lundberg wrote: robert burrell donkin wrote: i've uploaded JCL1.1FC to http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-logging/. it's not yet available through the distributions and it will be a day or two before the mirrors sync

Re: [logging] JCL 1.1 FC available for final checks

2006-05-14 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 20:18 +0200, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > robert burrell donkin wrote: > > i've uploaded JCL1.1FC to > > http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-logging/. it's not yet > > available through the distributions and it will be a day or two before > > the mirrors sync and i issue the

Re: [logging] JCL 1.1 FC available for final checks

2006-05-13 Thread Dennis Lundberg
robert burrell donkin wrote: i've uploaded JCL1.1FC to http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-logging/. it's not yet available through the distributions and it will be a day or two before the mirrors sync and i issue the official announcement. Robert, I have been unable to do a download earl

Re: [logging] JCL 1.1 FC available for final checks

2006-05-10 Thread Simon Kitching
On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 17:44 -0700, Wendy Smoak wrote: > On 5/9/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The Log4jFactory class appears to be missing. > > Never mind, it's in the release notes. Sorry, I expected 1.1 to be a > drop-in replacement and was surprised by the error. > > I don'

Re: [logging] JCL 1.1 FC available for final checks

2006-05-09 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 5/9/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The Log4jFactory class appears to be missing. Never mind, it's in the release notes. Sorry, I expected 1.1 to be a drop-in replacement and was surprised by the error. I don't recall any deprecation warnings, though. I've had this in commons-

Re: [logging] JCL 1.1 FC available for final checks

2006-05-09 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 5/9/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: so, please check that i have made no errors in cutting the candidate (ideally by dropping the jar in as a replacement for a RC or 1.0.4) and report back promptly if i have made any mistakes whilst cutting the distribution. The Log4jFa

[logging] JCL 1.1 FC available for final checks

2006-05-09 Thread robert burrell donkin
i've uploaded JCL1.1FC to http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-logging/. it's not yet available through the distributions and it will be a day or two before the mirrors sync and i issue the official announcement. so, please check that i have made no errors in cutting the candidate (ideally by