On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, SPRINGER,IAN (HP-NewJersey,ex1) wrote:
> |
> | More specifically, commons-logging explicitly declares
> | configuration of
> | the underlying logging implementation to be out of scope.
> |
> | > --Ian
> | >
> |
> | Craig
>
>
> Oh yes, you're right, I forgot to mention that.
rta Commons Developers List'
| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > Cc: "MAZZITELLI,JOHN (HP-NewJersey,ex2)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
| > "CAMPANA,SAL (HP-Philadelphia,ex1)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > Subject: RE: [logging] commons-logging and log4.configuration
|
velopers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "MAZZITELLI,JOHN (HP-NewJersey,ex2)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "CAMPANA,SAL (HP-Philadelphia,ex1)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: [logging] commons-logging and log4.configuration
>
> | > I don
| > I don't think you want to make commons-logging.properties contain
| > impl-specific config properties. Some impls might not even
| use a properties
| > file for their configuration - they might use XML or some
| other format.
| Well it might be nice to be able to specify the location of a con
> I don't think you want to make commons-logging.properties contain
> impl-specific config properties. Some impls might not even use a properties
> file for their configuration - they might use XML or some other format.
Well it might be nice to be able to specify the location of a config
file e.g.
| Hi,
|
| As I understand it, if I have a commons-logging.properties on my
| classpath then the concrete logger will use this properties file
| as its own configuration?
I don't think this is true.
| As it happens, I need to specify the log4.configuration system
| property to make it pick up i
Just got a new keyboard and the 'j' key now works ;)
Obviously, it should be log4j in the previous mails...
-John K
On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 16:10, John Keyes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As I understand it, if I have a commons-logging.properties on my
> classpath then the concrete logger will use this propert
Hi,
As I understand it, if I have a commons-logging.properties on my
classpath then the concrete logger will use this properties file
as its own configuration?
As it happens, I need to specify the log4.configuration system
property to make it pick up its own configuration. Is this
correct? Is
