Re: [net] Javadoc question

2004-06-29 Thread Jeffrey D. Brekke
Probably my fault back when we changed package names. Sorry about that. On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 23:51:45 -0400, Daniel F. Savarese [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Cohen writes: These broken links are almost all of the following form a href =

Re: [net] Javadoc question

2004-06-29 Thread Daniel F. Savarese
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jeffrey D. Brekke writes: Probably my fault back when we changed package names. Sorry about that. I don't think it occurred to anyone at the time that there were all of those hardcoded links that needed to be converted. If it's anyone's fault, it's mine since I

Re: [net] Javadoc question

2004-06-29 Thread Steve Cohen
In any case, thank you Daniel. On Tuesday 29 June 2004 7:39 pm, Daniel F. Savarese wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jeffrey D. Brekke writes: Probably my fault back when we changed package names. Sorry about that. I don't think it occurred to anyone at the time that there were all of

Re: [net] Javadoc question

2004-06-29 Thread Steve Cohen
I just pushed the site out. While I did not want to do another release (had I known Daniel could fix it so quickly I would have waited), I thought that at least the docs on our site should get the fixes, so I pushed the site and they do now, indeed, work. On Tuesday 29 June 2004 7:39 pm,

Re: [net] Javadoc question

2004-06-28 Thread Steve Cohen
Have at it, Daniel. You can surely do the job quicker than I can. On Sunday 27 June 2004 10:51 pm, Daniel F. Savarese wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Cohen writes: These broken links are almost all of the following form a href = org.apache.commons.net.package/Class.html Of

Re: [net] Javadoc question

2004-06-28 Thread Daniel F. Savarese
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Cohen writes: Have at it, Daniel. You can surely do the job quicker than I can. Alrighty, I'll get to it and report back when I finish. daniel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

[net] Javadoc question

2004-06-27 Thread Steve Cohen
I recently saw defect #29230 against commons-net. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29230 in which the author notices a broken link within the javadocs. I looked into this further and discovered that almost all of the handcoded links in the javadocs for commons-net are broken

Re: [net] Javadoc question

2004-06-27 Thread matthew.hawthorne
Steve Cohen wrote: What is the right way to express such links in javadoc? Relative paths? is there some sort of root notation that would correctly resolve intra-project javadoc links such as these? Finally, can maven, which generates these page from source help somehow in setting these up?

Re: [net] Javadoc question

2004-06-27 Thread Daniel F. Savarese
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Cohen writes: These broken links are almost all of the following form a href = org.apache.commons.net.package/Class.html Of course, these won't work. Can someone help me answer these questions? How did they ever work? Is this the result of some