BTW, you should always compile the release jar on JDK1.3,
as a 1.4 built one often doesn't run on JDK 1.2/1.3.
Do you have a reference to this documented somewhere? I had not heard
this.
I'm not going to look up specific methods, but the issue is that if JDK 1.3
has a method Class#f(Object),
Ouch! That's a bug. Please enter it into bugzilla. I guess we'll have to
get a fix release for that. It certainly was not the intent to release the
product for jdk 1.4+ and it's egg on my face.
On Tuesday 04 May 2004 1:06 pm, Edelson, Justin wrote:
Does the net 1.2 require JDK 1.4 to
I think a fix release is needed for this.
Guys, what should the name of such a version be?
Are there any guidelines about releasing a fix version for such a small but
vital thing?
On Tuesday 04 May 2004 4:17 pm, Steve Cohen wrote:
Ouch! That's a bug. Please enter it into bugzilla. I guess
changes, fixes only.
Thank you,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Steve Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 14:32
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [net] minimum jdk version?
I think a fix release is needed for this.
Guys, what should the name
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Cohen writes:
I think a fix release is needed for this.
Guys, what should the name of such a version be?
1.2.1
Are there any guidelines about releasing a fix version for such a small but
vital thing?
Just roll another release. Here's my +1 in advance.
