Re: [resources][all] Resources status

2006-03-06 Thread Dion Gillard
On 3/6/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Whatever happens, Latka needs the same to happen for it. It's been released, but only a 1.0-alpha1 N years ago. Not sure that even counts. +1. Latka is definitely dormant. -- http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ Chuck Norris sleeps with

Re: [resources][all] Resources status

2006-03-06 Thread James Mitchell
, 2006 1:01 AM Subject: Re: [resources][all] Resources status On 3/5/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/5/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can we establish the status of [resources]. snip/ Does a [resources] developer want to speak up in its favour? Or should

Re: [resources][all] Resources status

2006-03-06 Thread Martin Cooper
On 3/5/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/5/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/5/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/5/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can we establish the status of [resources]. Rahul Akolkar wrote:

Re: [resources][all] Resources status

2006-03-06 Thread Henri Yandell
On 3/6/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/5/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Phil's suggestion for FeedParser was: We need to make a decision on which way to go here...either demote back to sandbox/dormant or have someone step up to drive this component toward a

[resources][all] Resources status

2006-03-05 Thread Stephen Colebourne
Can we establish the status of [resources]. Rahul Akolkar wrote: * [resources] Since now it isn't part of Struts 1.3.0, seems thats a setback to interest in releasing. IFAIK: - its unreleased - there is little development effort (although something happened in November) - there could be a

Re: [resources][all] Resources status

2006-03-05 Thread Niall Pemberton
On 3/5/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can we establish the status of [resources]. Rahul Akolkar wrote: * [resources] Since now it isn't part of Struts 1.3.0, seems thats a setback to interest in releasing. IFAIK: - its unreleased - there is little development effort

Re: [resources][all] Resources status

2006-03-05 Thread Martin Cooper
On 3/5/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/5/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can we establish the status of [resources]. snip/ Does a [resources] developer want to speak up in its favour? Or should we fast track it to dormant? If no other commons

Re: [resources][all] Resources status

2006-03-05 Thread Henri Yandell
On 3/5/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can we establish the status of [resources]. Rahul Akolkar wrote: * [resources] Since now it isn't part of Struts 1.3.0, seems thats a setback to interest in releasing. IFAIK: - its unreleased - there is little development effort

Re: [resources][all] Resources status

2006-03-05 Thread Martin Cooper
On 3/5/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/5/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can we establish the status of [resources]. Rahul Akolkar wrote: * [resources] Since now it isn't part of Struts 1.3.0, seems thats a setback to interest in releasing.

Re: [resources][all] Resources status

2006-03-05 Thread Henri Yandell
On 3/5/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/5/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/5/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can we establish the status of [resources]. Rahul Akolkar wrote: * [resources] Since now it isn't part of Struts 1.3.0,