Re: [resources] status was (Re: [lang] i18n package proposal)

2004-02-10 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 29 Jan 2004, at 07:28, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: snip Before a real 1.0 release I would really like to see a JDBC based implementation added, but that doesn't need to be a gating factor for promotion to commons proper (especially if I don't have time to work on it, although it's becoming

Re: [resources] status was (Re: [lang] i18n package proposal)

2004-01-29 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Quoting Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Mark R. Diggory wrote: Ask those developing it for a status. Resources developers, what is the status of resources, how close are you to releasing? It's partly my fault, I suspect, that it isn't further down the pike.

Re: [resources] status was (Re: [lang] i18n package proposal)

2004-01-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message- From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 07:28 AM To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' Subject: Re: [resources] status was (Re: [lang] i18n package proposal) Quoting Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, 28 Jan