mbre 2005 06:32
> À : Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Objet : Re: [maven] dist plugin for zip-crlf conversation
> (was: [vfs][VOTE] release version 1.0)
>
> On 11/14/05, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Phil Steitz wrote:
> > > That wil
On 11/14/05, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Phil Steitz wrote:
> > That will screw up diffs, won't it? Probably best to leave the
> > sources along and just apply to .txt files, as the current version
> > does.
> Not sure about that. When I use subversion to get files they end up
Phil Steitz wrote:
That will screw up diffs, won't it? Probably best to leave the
sources along and just apply to .txt files, as the current version
does.
Not sure about that. When I use subversion to get files they end up with
Windows EOL. I think thats what we are trying to replicate.
Steph
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 21:09 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 11/13/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 19:16 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> > > Mario Ivankovits wrote:
> > > > As far as I know the next NET version will be able to use target 1.3
> > >
On 11/14/05, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Mario,
>
>For the assert:assertPluginAvailable tag you need the last
> plugin-plugin. Sorry, we'll try to simplify this ASAP.
>
>For maven 1.1, did you try the bootstrap ? What is the error ? Can you
> send it to me plea
lease ?
Arnaud
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Mario Ivankovits [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : lundi 14 novembre 2005 09:37
> À : Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Objet : Re: [maven] dist plugin for zip-crlf conversation
> (was: [vfs][VOTE] release version 1
On 12.11.2005, at 17:05, Mario Ivankovits wrote:
*scared*, only one +1 after three days :-o
I hope you all are busy checking the code, arent you?
sorry, missed the call for vote
+1 for a release
cheers
--
Torsten
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Phil Steitz wrote:
Has now been fixed in svn.
So if you checkout the latest maven 1 dist plugin sources from
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/maven-1/plugins/trunk/dist/
and then do
maven plugin:install from the dist plugin directory, maven dist will
put windows style line endings in the zip
Is there a problem with getting a release of the plugin?
On 11/14/05, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/13/05, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 11/13/05, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi Stephen!
> > >
> > > Thanks for your review.
> > >
> > > > The re
On 11/13/05, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/13/05, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Stephen!
> >
> > Thanks for your review.
> >
> > > The release notes cover changes in RCs. For a 1.0 release, the release
> > > notes should be clean and state that this is the firs
On 11/13/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 19:16 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> > Mario Ivankovits wrote:
> > >> The jar was built with JDK1.4. Are targetting only JDK1.4? If you
> > >> target 1.2/1.3, then it is possible that your jar won't work. I
>
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 19:16 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> Mario Ivankovits wrote:
> >> The jar was built with JDK1.4. Are targetting only JDK1.4? If you
> >> target 1.2/1.3, then it is possible that your jar won't work. I
> >> recommend compiling using the earliest JDK possible.
> >
> > Sur
On 11/14/05, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Stephen!
>
> > The jar was built with JDK1.4. Are targetting only JDK1.4? If you
> > target 1.2/1.3, then it is possible that your jar won't work. I
> > recommend compiling using the earliest JDK possible.
> Sure, but e.g. commons-net 1
On 11/13/05, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Stephen!
>
> Thanks for your review.
>
> > The release notes cover changes in RCs. For a 1.0 release, the release
> > notes should be clean and state that this is the first full release
> > (except if the software is already in really wi
Mario Ivankovits wrote:
The jar was built with JDK1.4. Are targetting only JDK1.4? If you
target 1.2/1.3, then it is possible that your jar won't work. I
recommend compiling using the earliest JDK possible.
Sure, but e.g. commons-net 1.4.0 was built with 1.4 too (+target 1.4),
and thus I cant
Hi Stephen!
Thanks for your review.
The release notes cover changes in RCs. For a 1.0 release, the release
notes should be clean and state that this is the first full release
(except if the software is already in really widespread use). There is
no real need to detail other changes unless you
Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Please vote:
[ ] +1 release RC6 as 1.0
[ ] -1 take some additional time
The release notes cover changes in RCs. For a 1.0 release, the release
notes should be clean and state that this is the first full release
(except if the software is already in really widespread u
+1
On 11/9/05, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> After so many RCs I really think its time to take a break and release
> what we have now.
> VFS is stable and in daily use. Some enhancements waiting just too long
> for this release to get implemented for 1.1.
>
> As previously
I'm ++1 (non-committer) on releasing it 1.0, I've checked the RC5, but
haven't
had a chance to check the RC6 yet...
- Filip
> *scared*, only one +1 after three days :-o
>
> I hope you all are busy checking the code, arent you?
>
> Added [all] to this post, maybe you setup some filtering.
>> Hi!
+1
I have limited experience with VFS and haven't reviewed all the code yet but
in it's current state it looks to me pretty stable. And there aren't major
bugs either (5 open bugs when last checked).
This is why I vote for shipping RC6 as 1.0 final so that work can start for
1.1.
Regards,
Robert
*scared*, only one +1 after three days :-o
I hope you all are busy checking the code, arent you?
Added [all] to this post, maybe you setup some filtering.
Hi!
After so many RCs I really think its time to take a break and release
what we have now.
VFS is stable and in daily use. Some enhanceme
Mario Ivankovits wrote:
I can manually edit the build.xml, should I?
Ok, answered myself - its fixed now.
Thanks!
---
Mario
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oliver Heger wrote:
Everything looks good to me. But when I tried building with ant the
jakarta-slide-webdavlib could not be loaded resulting in compile
errors (with maven build was successful). Is this is a problem with
build.xml?
The problem is, that the webdavlib is not on ibiblio, but my ma
Everything looks good to me. But when I tried building with ant the
jakarta-slide-webdavlib could not be loaded resulting in compile errors
(with maven build was successful). Is this is a problem with build.xml?
When this problem is fixed (or if you confirm that this is not an
issue), I am +1.
Hi!
After so many RCs I really think its time to take a break and release
what we have now.
VFS is stable and in daily use. Some enhancements waiting just too long
for this release to get implemented for 1.1.
As previously posted please find the RC6 at
http://people.apache.org/~imario/vfs
25 matches
Mail list logo
