Re: 1.3 vs. 1.4 jdk [was Re: [ANN][DBCP][Pool] First Release Candidates available for the 1.1 releases of Commons DBCP & Pool]

2003-10-01 Thread Dirk Verbeeck
I compiled everything with a jdk 1.4.1 java version "1.4.1-p3" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.1-p3-brian_28_jul_2003_12_35) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.1-p3-brian_28_jul_2003_12_35, mixed mode) and I just did a compatibility test on a 1.3.1 jvm. java versio

RE: 1.3 vs. 1.4 jdk [was Re: [ANN][DBCP][Pool] First Release Candidates available for the 1.1 releases of Commons DBCP & Pool]

2003-10-01 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> In [dbutils] I need to learn how to do conditional compilation as it > absolutely has to have two jars due to extension of ResultSet, but it's > not such a need in dbcp. Still, maybe the answer is the obvious one. See James. We have the code setup using Ant so that depending upon which JDK is u

Re: 1.3 vs. 1.4 jdk [was Re: [ANN][DBCP][Pool] First Release Candidates available for the 1.1 releases of Commons DBCP & Pool]

2003-10-01 Thread Rodney Waldhoff
If I remember correctly, previously we've been releasing the 1.4 compiled JARs (and that's what the nightly builds are as well). This seems to work just fine under 1.3 (even 1.2) in pratice, the only caveat being you should avoid using the JDK 1.4 only methods from JDK 1.3 (otherwise you'll get a

1.3 vs. 1.4 jdk [was Re: [ANN][DBCP][Pool] First Release Candidates available for the 1.1 releases of Commons DBCP & Pool]

2003-09-30 Thread John McNally
Code compiled with a 1.3 jdk is not compatible with java 1.4 jdbc api. I did not check, but assume any jars for release will be compiled with a 1.4 jdk? I think the hope is that a jar compiled with 1.4 will be usable in a 1.3 environment, so that we only distribute one. I'm not sure if that comp