Ortwin Glück wrote:
-1
Filtering can be done in most mail clients if the right subject prefixes
are used. A separate list is not necessary.
i.e. use [VOTE][Codec] and not just [VOTE]
for votes interesting for all projects you could use [VOTE][COMMONS] or
[VOTE][ALL] or similar
I
The most recent dicsussion of having a commons-vote list had pretty good
support but the thread died away.
Not having a dedicated place to vote is a continuous problem for
HttpClient, and would be for any other project that is looking towards
its own list. When we vote, we have to decide:
+1
- robert
On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 06:12 PM, Jeffrey Dever wrote:
The most recent dicsussion of having a commons-vote list had pretty good
support but the thread died away.
Not having a dedicated place to vote is a continuous problem for
HttpClient, and would be for any other
Dever wrote:
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 13:12:32 -0500
From: Jeffrey Dever [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: A new VOTE list commoons-vote
The most recent dicsussion of having a commons
-1
Filtering can be done in most mail clients if the right subject prefixes
are used. A separate list is not necessary.
i.e. use [VOTE][Codec] and not just [VOTE]
for votes interesting for all projects you could use [VOTE][COMMONS] or
[VOTE][ALL] or similar
