Hi Neeme,
> In my view, it is better to have different projects specializing:
> * AXgen specializes in (reading in and modeling) XMI related stuff
AXgen uses NSUML to read in XMI.
AXgen is not able to do modeling. We use ArgoUML or Poseidon.
AXgen is just a simple combination of NSUML and Velocit
Axel Hohaus wrote:
Why using a second XML-scheme to generating all output (ddl,
ojb-classes, repository). XMI is also XML based description of all
nedded informations.
Using an existing project, like commons-sql, to individualize ddl's for
specific RDBMS and generating an simplified XML from Axg
> I think the projects are a little different - their main
> difference is what is the source of the generation process.
You are right!
> e.g. a single AXGen template could generate a commons-sql
> model from XMI so then AXGen users could take advantage of
> common-sql's ability to generate D
