Kenneth,
--- Kenneth Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
After having used a little time looking at the code of package
org.apache.commons.jxpath.ri.model, I have come to the following
conclusion:
When taking into account that the only difference between a bean
like
object and
Hi.
After having used a little time looking at the code of package
org.apache.commons.jxpath.ri.model, I have come to the following conclusion:
When taking into account that the only difference between a bean like
object and value-objects created by Castor, is that the later defines many
Hi.
I am using Castor for creating java objects capable of containing data
conforming to certain xsd-schemas. When using Castor to create a java
structure capable of containing data of xml entities following schema:
xs:element name=Request
xs:complexType
Kenneth,
I am not familiar with Castor enough to give you specific
recommendations, but here are some general ideas.
1. The mapping of paths to objects in JXPath is based on the JavaBean
specification. So, I guess I would first look into flattening
properties to make the beans conform strictly
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 9. oktober 2002 16:52
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: Customizing JXPath. Custom Containers.
Kenneth,
I am not familiar with Castor enough to give you specific
recommendations, but here are some general ideas.
1. The mapping
