--- Alex Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm curious if the vote was ever taken, and if so,
> what was the result ?
> I'd very much like
> to see Functor come alive again and start taking
> advantage of the
> benefits of Java 5/6.
No vote has been taken. I'll start one when
Hello,
I'm curious if the vote was ever taken, and if so, what was the result ?
I'd very much like
to see Functor come alive again and start taking advantage of the
benefits of Java 5/6.
Alex Marshall
Software Developer
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MSN Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ:
On 5/30/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Right, I meant "whether the vote should be held" as in
"are there any reasons why reviving [functor] would be
simply out of the question?" I wasn't implying any
desire to circumvent established protocols. :)
Not sure if there is an est
On 5/30/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Pete--
I could be interested in being the Jakarta commons
conduit for a revival of the functor code. According
to the jakarta website, "A revival of a Commons
Dormant component must be preceded by a VOTE on the
commons developers mailing l
--- Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/30/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Hi Pete--
> >
> > I could be interested in being the Jakarta
> commons
> > conduit for a revival of the functor code.
> According
> > to the jakarta website, "A revival of a Commons
> > Dorm
Hi Pete--
I could be interested in being the Jakarta commons
conduit for a revival of the functor code. According
to the jakarta website, "A revival of a Commons
Dormant component must be preceded by a VOTE on the
commons developers mailing list." Is there a general
feeling on-list as to wheth
Hi all,
I'm not really sure how this is done but over the past year and a half
or so, I've been working one of the original functor contributors,
Jason Horman, on a branch of functor and we've made a lot of progress
with it. For example, it's updated to take advantage of generics which
is extreme
