i'd just like to point out that i didn't write that bit of code (but
neither did i correct it).
personally speaking, i'm not going to risk having patches vetoed because i
try to correct the original author's coding style.
any committer who has the time and energy to fight is very welcome to
c
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
| It is amazing to me...with all the discussion about coding styles and
| following them, we still have people committing code that doesn't follow
| what rules we do have...
|
| on 1/3/02 11:00 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
| Re:
Yeah, it's sitting right in front of me :)
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Ted Husted wrote:
> A nice alternative to Sun's (a superset really) is the Elements of Java
> Style. Highly recommended.
>
> http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0521777682
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > Sigh. That isn't
A nice alternative to Sun's (a superset really) is the Elements of Java
Style. Highly recommended.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0521777682
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Sigh. That isn't the argument. The argument is about following what
> > conventions we do have. It could be about
> Sigh. That isn't the argument. The argument is about following what
> conventions we do have. It could be about coding, voting policies,
> whatever...if people ignore the rules, then we shouldn't bother having rules
> at all.
I'm going through exactly this situation in my new employment. One gr
> Anyone ever thought of running the code through a code fomatter when the
> nightly build is done?... that'd save all issues and arguments (except
> those of naming conventions).
Have you got good success of using this on a project?
My experience has been that it causes pain in CVS. Instead yo
on 1/3/02 9:26 PM, "Arron Bates" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Couldn't we all just agree that arguing about coding convention is like
> bringing up politics and religion at a dinner party?...
Sigh. That isn't the argument. The argument is about following what
conventions we do have. It could be
on 1/3/02 9:04 PM, "Donnie Hale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not to be nitpicky, but doesn't Turbine have a coding standard document that
> differs from the "official" Java conventions to which you refer? Not a big
> deal - IIRC, I much prefer Turbine's brace placement vs. the "standard". I
> ju
Couldn't we all just agree that arguing about coding convention is like
bringing up politics and religion at a dinner party?...
When you work with a team of developers, you'll end up working amongst
many styles and preferences, like it or not. Just as long as the big
ones aren't broken (eg. if
o Sun's conventions but are on a
project with some differences.
Donnie
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon Scott Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 8:54 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Mor
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 05:54:20PM -0800, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
> It is amazing to me...with all the discussion about coding styles and
> following them, we still have people committing code that doesn't follow
> what rules we do have...
>
> on 1/3/02 11:00 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROT
It is amazing to me...with all the discussion about coding styles and
following them, we still have people committing code that doesn't follow
what rules we do have...
on 1/3/02 11:00 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/logging/src/java/org/apache/c
12 matches
Mail list logo
