In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], steve cohen writes:
Seems to me the HashMap --- Hashtable change could be made against HEAD.
It's only NECESSARY for 1.1 compatibility but it poses no great problem for a
1.2 compatible version; it isn't as if this would impact some functionality
deep in the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], steve cohen writes:
This code was calling a method in ORO that returned a Collection, also not
JDK1.1 compatible. Since the older ORO method that returned a Vector had
been deprecated, I looked at what it was doing, which was simply splitting a
string on a comma.
Seems to me the HashMap --- Hashtable change could be made against HEAD.
It's only NECESSARY for 1.1 compatibility but it poses no great problem for a
1.2 compatible version; it isn't as if this would impact some functionality
deep in the core of the product. So after this is done, a
On Thursday 01 January 2004 09:06 am, Jeffrey D. Brekke wrote:
Maven uses the following property: maven.compiler.target which
defaults to 1.1 so what I last released generated 1.1 compatible class
files.
http://maven.apache.org/reference/plugins/java/properties.html
Example:
maven
I believe it just produces 1.1 compatible class files. Maven just
passes the setting to the ant task, which passes it to javac. Since
the HashMap class is is not present under 1.1 I guess we'd just get a
ClassNotFoundException.
I believe that should be all we need, we shouldn't need to
Yes, in order to verify that the code doesn't use any 1.2+ code I found that
you have to also use bootclasspath={path to jdk1.1.8 classes.zip}
There were a couple of other instances:
use of ArrayLists in VMSFTPEntryParser and in ExtendedNNTPOps.java
in the examples section.
I cleaned all of
This makes a lot of sense, Daniel, and as long as I stay unemployed, I will
even have time to devote to the project :-)
I am not completely CVS-literate and setting up the branches is beyond my
current level of experience but probably would be good experience for me.
I am working now on a
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], steve cohen writes:
I am not completely CVS-literate and setting up the branches is beyond my
current level of experience but probably would be good experience for me.
In my response to Jeffrey's email, I asked about whether we wanted to
replace the existing
