-Source Java Consultant
Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components
http://howardlewisship.com
-Original Message-
From: Christian Essl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 4:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HiveMind] nested schemas
Thanks for the hint
]
Subject: Re: [HiveMind] nested schemas
Thanks for the hint on schema-id!
I've added it now. Checking and complaining early :).
I removed the configuration-id and service-id atts and have just
schema-id.
However I still want to access schemas even if they don't
provide an id.
Therefore in my current
Thank you! Certainly a schema-id attribute must be added. I did not know
about the change in schema. Is schema now a top-level element?
However I'd like to keep the configuration-id and especially the service-id
atts. Actually my first use case was to decorate BuilderFactory. Apart of
this
: [HiveMind] nested schemas
I'm a little nervous about the use of configuration-id or service-id ... why not
schema-id.
Recently, schema was, effectively, promoted to first-class status (a schema's id is
qualified with
the module id and may be referenced from other modules).
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
I'm a little nervous about the use of configuration-id or service-id ... why not
schema-id.
Recently, schema was, effectively, promoted to first-class status (a schema's id is
qualified with
the module id and may be referenced from other modules).
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Independent J2EE /
