Thanks Lukas; I'll skip it then and just do the release.
Hen
On 10/4/06, Lukas Theussl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The maven-dist-plugin-1.7 allows to configure the line endings [1],
however, it requires Maven 1.1.
-Lukas
[1] http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/plugins/dist/properties.html
Henr
The maven-dist-plugin-1.7 allows to configure the line endings [1],
however, it requires Maven 1.1.
-Lukas
[1] http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/plugins/dist/properties.html
Henri Yandell wrote:
bin zip comes from Ant, src zip from Maven. The usual story :)
I'll take a peek tomorrow morning
bin zip comes from Ant, src zip from Maven. The usual story :)
I'll take a peek tomorrow morning to see if there's any obvious way to fix that.
Hen
On 10/3/06, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
although strangely the line endings are windows friendly in the bin zip,
but not wind
+1
although strangely the line endings are windows friendly in the bin zip,
but not windows friendly in the src zip!
Stephen
Henri Yandell wrote:
Another try to get it right :)
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-2.2-rc3/
(ignoring the various javadoc symlinking I'll need to do b
wrote:
How are we doing with the release? Any blockers?
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 11:19 AM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE][lang] Commons Lang 2.2-rc3
>
> L
How are we doing with the release? Any blockers?
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 11:19 AM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE][lang] Commons Lang 2.2-rc3
>
> Look
Looks like it is due to a javadoc plugin bug when
is set. Being of a suspicious mind, I dug into
why we have a modification for 'FakeClass'. We don't have a class with
that name, so suspicion increases. Looks like it snuck in from Dion's
trunk when he applied a large patch from Carlos a long time
On 9/27/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Another try to get it right :)
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-2.2-rc3/
(ignoring the various javadoc symlinking I'll need to do before the
real site release)
[X] +1
[ ] -1
As an aside, I've noticed similar behavior with th
+1 from me.
The distros look good - but the javadocs in the website are missing
the package descriptions - the javadocs in the binary distro are fine
though.
Niall
On 9/27/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Another try to get it right :)
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang
Our application builds and all tests pass with this version.
+1.
Gary
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 10:42 AM
> > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > > Subject: [VOTE][lang] Commons Lang 2.2-rc3
I've fixed the Javadoc one. A simple c+p rather than the more improved
version we have in trunk now. I'd not set up the Javadoc when putting
that method back in.
When I repeated a 'maven site', the SerializationUtils ones went away. Weird.
Hen
On 9/27/06, Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ack, let's not mess with it at this point then.
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 12:29 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE][lang] Commons Lang 2.2-rc3
>
> I
It's a maven generated page though - so not something that is too
desirable to mess with. From their point of view, someone could have
Cobertura, Clover and JCoverage reports on the same page so you
couldn't call each one of them "Test Coverage".
Hen
On 9/27/06, Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm pretty sure we were batting zero for checkstyle errors; so those
are definitely new. Ack! It's the same machine, same version of
software, same directory on the machine.
Hen
On 9/27/06, Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi:
I wish you had not deleted the RC2 because it feels like the
Hi:
I wish you had not deleted the RC2 because it feels like the errors
listed on:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-2.2-rc3/site/checkstyle-re
port.html
for:
org/apache/commons/lang/SerializationUtils.java
were not present in RC2.
Am I dreaming? (on this topic ;)
Gary
> -Or
Hello:
For the site, I think that under "Project Reports", the item "Cobertura"
is a bad idea because it does not describe what "it" is but rather "how"
it was created. I care to find the "Test Coverage" report but I do not
need to know the particular technology that was used in the heading.
2c,
Looks like something that was hitting the Maven CI recently too:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-notifications/200608.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
So I've gone ahead and rolled back the plugin and rebuilt the site.
Please disregard the noise and continue voting :)
Hen
On 9/27/06, Hen
Looks like something went wrong with the Cobertura report. Digging into that.
On 9/27/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Another try to get it right :)
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-2.2-rc3/
(ignoring the various javadoc symlinking I'll need to do before the
real site
18 matches
Mail list logo
