Re: [all] new list for cvs commits? (was Re: commons-configuration)

2003-10-30 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
__matthewHawthorne wrote: gmane.org is great, that's how I access the apache mailing lists. A good filtering technique is to mark all messages as read, except for projects that you're interested in. I apologize for going off topic, but has anyone experienced delays when sending with gmane? My

Re: [all] new list for cvs commits? (was Re: commons-configuration)

2003-10-30 Thread __matthewHawthorne
gmane.org is great, that's how I access the apache mailing lists. A good filtering technique is to mark all messages as read, except for projects that you're interested in. I apologize for going off topic, but has anyone experienced delays when sending with gmane? My sent messages show up almo

Re: [all] new list for cvs commits? (was Re: commons-configuration)

2003-10-30 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Emmanuel Bourg wrote: It seems some prefer to keep the commit messages in the list, and others prefer a clean list with just the discussions. So what about this : - commons-dev : discussions + cvs messages - commons-cvs : only the cvs messages - commons-talk: only the discussions or maybe easie

RE: [all] new list for cvs commits? (was Re: commons-configuration)

2003-10-30 Thread Eric Pugh
sense of community and spirit.. Eric > -Original Message- > From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 3:02 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [all] new list for cvs commits? (was Re: > commons-configuration) >

Re: [all] new list for cvs commits? (was Re: commons-configuration)

2003-10-30 Thread David Graham
--- Emmanuel Bourg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It seems some prefer to keep the commit messages in the list, and others > > prefer a clean list with just the discussions. So what about this : > > - commons-dev : discussions + cvs messages > - commons-cvs : only the cvs messages > - commons-talk

Re: [all] new list for cvs commits? (was Re: commons-configuration)

2003-10-30 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
It seems some prefer to keep the commit messages in the list, and others prefer a clean list with just the discussions. So what about this : - commons-dev : discussions + cvs messages - commons-cvs : only the cvs messages - commons-talk: only the discussions or maybe easier to set up : - commons

Re: [all] new list for cvs commits? (was Re: commons-configuration)

2003-10-30 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
I think the mailing list guidelines at http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail2.html#Commons could include at least a warning like some other lists at Jakarta. Something like "Subscribers to this list will also get notices of every CVS checkin of new or changed code modules". Emmanuel smime.p7s

Re: [all] new list for cvs commits? (was Re: commons-configuration)

2003-10-29 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
I agree that contributors should keep an eye on CVS commits, but a separate list doesn't prevent them from doing so. That's less confusing for newcomers like Hernan, reduce the noise for the non commiter folks here just interested in the discussions, and makes the archive more readable. Emmanu

RE: [all] new list for cvs commits? (was Re: commons-configuration)

2003-10-29 Thread Noel J. Bergman
CVS commit messages here usually go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] That address is directed to $project-dev@ because developers are expected to maintain oversight of the CVS. The problem with Jakarta Commons is that all projects are on one list. If there is too much traffic for a given subproject, a separ

Re: [all] new list for cvs commits? (was Re: commons-configuration)

2003-10-29 Thread David Graham
It makes sense for the commit messages to be delivered to the dev list because they directly relate to the development of the project. The problem with commons-dev is that many different projects use it so the volume is higher than other dev lists. Simple email filtering rules help to get rid of