Stephen Colebourne wrote:
The biggest difference seems to be the lack of a
public void save(OutputStream output, String Header)
Any particular reason why it was removed? Could it be put back?
Stephen
I don't know but it seems the first version of the save method in
BasePropertiesConfiguration wa
The biggest difference seems to be the lack of a
public void save(OutputStream output, String Header)
Any particular reason why it was removed? Could it be put back?
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Emmanuel Bourg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An ExtendedProperties can be easily replaced wit
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
My question is whether [configuration] is more complex to use than
ExtendedProperties. If there is no single equivalent class, then I'm not
sure I can deprecate in [collections].
An ExtendedProperties can be easily replaced with a
PropertiesConfiguration, it has the same
tion).
Yoav Shapira
Millennium ChemInformatics
>-Original Message-
>From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 8:22 AM
>To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
>Subject: Re: [configuration] [collections] ExtendedProperties
>
>
&g
ge-
>From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 8:22 AM
>To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
>Subject: Re: [configuration] [collections] ExtendedProperties
>
>
>Deprecate from both? :)
>
>Hen
>
>On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Emmanuel Bourg
Deprecate from both? :)
Hen
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Actually ExtendedProperties isn't even used in [configuration], there
> are just a method getConfiguration(ExtendedProperties) and a method
> getExtendedProperties(Configuration) in ConfigurationConverter to
> maintain com
Actually ExtendedProperties isn't even used in [configuration], there
are just a method getConfiguration(ExtendedProperties) and a method
getExtendedProperties(Configuration) in ConfigurationConverter to
maintain compatibility with older code using ExtendedProperties.
I'd suggest to deprecate i