[2004-05-19 11:30] Emmanuel Bourg said:
| Brent Verner wrote:
|
| >After looking at [vfs], I'm not sure which parts of it would be
| Yes the idea is to use [vfs] to retrieve the configuration file, not to
| parse it.
right on. forthcoming implementation will use vfs as the default
when no othe
Brent Verner wrote:
After looking at [vfs], I'm not sure which parts of it would be
used to implement the key/value nature of a Configuration; maybe
only the setAttribute/getAttribute bits?
In any case, I'm gonna finish my originally planned refactoring
and then we can discuss what else should be
[2004-05-18 17:23] Emmanuel Bourg said:
| Brent Verner wrote:
|
| > CURL - entry point for loading configurations. basically,
| > a CURL is a primitive URL-like object takes a
| > Configuration URL, i.e.,
| >file:/path/to/file.${EXTENSION}
| >res:/path/to
ease managering the
1.0, which means we should have something soon!
Eric
> -Original Message-
> From: Brent Verner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 1:42 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [configuration] request for comments on refac
Brent Verner wrote:
CURL - entry point for loading configurations. basically,
a CURL is a primitive URL-like object takes a
Configuration URL, i.e.,
file:/path/to/file.${EXTENSION}
res:/path/to/file.${EXTENSION}
jdbc:${JDBC_URL} [1]
[2004-05-18 12:35] Emmanuel Bourg said:
| Brent Verner wrote:
|
| >org.apache.commons.configuration.event
| > ConfigurationChangedListener - receives notification when a
| > Configuration has changed
| > ConfigurationChangedEvent - sent by a ConfigurationProvider
| > when its Configura
Brent Verner wrote:
org.apache.commons.configuration.event
ConfigurationChangedListener - receives notification when a
Configuration has changed
ConfigurationChangedEvent - sent by a ConfigurationProvider
when its Configuration (or storage) has been modified.
In my config syst
Brent Verner wrote:
BTW, is there any reason that PropertiesConfiguration should
not be made to be compliant with java.util.Properties files?
I'm aware of the current duplicate-keys-create-lists behaviour,
but IMO, it would be best to have the _same_ semantics as the
java.util.Properties files.
