Re: [general] lang scope?

2002-12-05 Thread Stephen Colebourne
gt; Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 11:50 AM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [general] lang scope? > > > On Thursday, December 5, 2002, at 06:35 PM, Tom Drake wrote: > > > It sounds like I've jumped into a bit of a hornets nest. > > t

RE: [general] lang scope?

2002-12-05 Thread Tom Drake
: Thursday, December 05, 2002 11:50 AM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [general] lang scope? On Thursday, December 5, 2002, at 06:35 PM, Tom Drake wrote: > It sounds like I've jumped into a bit of a hornets nest. this is actually pretty tame :) but it's too late t

Re: [general] lang scope?

2002-12-05 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Thursday, December 5, 2002, at 06:35 PM, Tom Drake wrote: It sounds like I've jumped into a bit of a hornets nest. this is actually pretty tame :) but it's too late to jump of the frying pan... I was thinking this morning that such a move will run a high risk of creating a circular depend

RE: [general] lang scope? (was Re: [collections][lang] Predicate etc impls, was Re: commons-collections: New code contribution.)

2002-12-05 Thread Tom Drake
It sounds like I've jumped into a bit of a hornets nest. I was thinking this morning that such a move will run a high risk of creating a circular dependancy between [collections] and [lang][functor]. It seems likely that functors would want to use collection objects and vice-versa. If I'm right ab