Re: [lang] 2.1RC7 and java < 1.4

2005-05-31 Thread Steven Caswell
n Kitching [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 12:40 AM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: RE: [lang] 2.1RC7 and java < 1.4 > > On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 11:34 -0400, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > > > > Here is what I propose baring any -1s f

RE: [lang] 2.1RC7 and java < 1.4

2005-05-31 Thread Gary Gregory
n Kitching [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 12:40 AM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: RE: [lang] 2.1RC7 and java < 1.4 On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 11:34 -0400, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > Here is what I propose baring any -1s from others: I'll make the c

RE: [lang] 2.1RC7 and java < 1.4

2005-05-30 Thread Simon Kitching
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 11:34 -0400, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > Here is what I propose baring any -1s from others: I'll make the changes > noted below while still using the "old" test invocation style for the > Enum/Enums test. This last class loading problem being a weird one. Hm, > now that I thi

RE: [lang] 2.1RC7 and java < 1.4 [WAS:] DateUtils test fails under 1.2.2 and not under 1.4.2

2005-05-29 Thread Gary Gregory
ay 29, 2005 6:12 AM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Cc: Gary Gregory; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [lang] 2.1RC7 and java < 1.4 [WAS:] DateUtils test fails under 1.2.2 and not under 1.4.2 I actually overlooked your e-mail on this when I back through to decide if we had resolved everything

Re: [lang] 2.1RC7 and java < 1.4 [WAS:] DateUtils test fails under 1.2.2 and not under 1.4.2

2005-05-29 Thread Steven Caswell
I actually overlooked your e-mail on this when I back through to decide if we had resolved everything and I apologize for that. I don't have any problem with your prosal to make Ant 1.6 a prereq, so I'll put in my +1. On 5/29/05, Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello: > > Note tha