FYI: I've regen'ed the site below for the latest commits.
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Gary Gregory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 12:35 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: RE: [lang] StrMatcher in text subpackage
Gregory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 12:35 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: RE: [lang] StrMatcher in text subpackage
>
> Hello:
>
> Stephen: You can find a current "maven site:generate", including
Clover
> coverage repo
e-
> From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 11:56 AM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [lang] StrMatcher in text subpackage
>
> Gary Gregory wrote:
> > I also have a (fantasy?) goal that we could get 100% un
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 2:56 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [lang] StrMatcher in text subpackage
Gary Gregory wrote:
> I also have a (fantasy?) goal that we could get 100% unit test
coverage
> for the new text package. ;-)
Maybe possible, but my
Gary Gregory wrote:
I also have a (fantasy?) goal that we could get 100% unit test coverage
for the new text package. ;-)
Maybe possible, but my maven jcoverage is broken at the moment and gives
no useful results. So, its not something I can work on.
Stephen
Hello:
Perhaps the Javadoc could mention when to use a StrMatcher vs RE's in
1.4 or Jakarta's ORO.
I would say that removing any code duplication is key in this on-going
refactoring. So I look forward to seeing the complete refactoring.
I also have a (fantasy?) goal that we could get 100% unit t
