As a user of, rather than contributor to, lang, I agree with Stephen.
While also a Queen's English user, the convention for programming
libraries is clearly established as US English. All the java standard
libraries use this convention, so it seems inconsistent to use other
spelling elsewhere. I
Subject: Re: [lang] StringUtils misspelled method names?
As a user of, rather than contributor to, lang, I agree with Stephen.
While also a Queen's English user, the convention for
programming libraries is clearly established as US English.
All the java standard libraries
Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [lang] StringUtils misspelled method names?
As a user of, rather than contributor to, lang, I agree with Stephen.
While also a Queen's English user, the convention for
programming libraries is clearly established as US English.
All the java standard
-Original Message-
From: Simon Kitching [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 14 August 2003 9:30 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [lang] StringUtils misspelled method names?
As a user of, rather than contributor to, lang, I agree with Stephen
Developers List
Subject: RE: [lang] StringUtils misspelled method names?
The difficulty comes in what you define the project as. If it's Lang, then
we generally don't care. If it's Jakarta, then I suspect there's a strong
enough pro-US vote.
As none of the non-US-english writing people so
- Original Message -
From: Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 1:08 AM
Subject: RE: [lang] StringUtils misspelled method names?
Change commited. I'm not sure how much javadoc we do for deprecated
, August 14, 2003 1:08 AM
Subject: RE: [lang] StringUtils misspelled method names?
Change commited. I'm not sure how much javadoc we do for deprecated
methods. I can happily c+p some javadoc but have done the normal simple
deprecated/link line rather than repeat the javadoc all over again.
I've
