RE: [lang] StringUtils.split ignores empty items (Bugzilla bug# 22692)

2004-07-11 Thread Steven Caswell
of better men than himself. John Stuart Mill. -Original Message- From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 2:35 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [lang] StringUtils.split ignores empty items (Bugzilla bug# 22692

RE: [lang] StringUtils.split ignores empty items (Bugzilla bug# 22692)

2004-07-07 Thread Steven Caswell
To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' Subject: RE: [lang] StringUtils.split ignores empty items (Bugzilla bug# 22692) Gary didn't like splitPreserve. I originally suggested splitPreserve so that's fine by me. I could also go with splitAll. And I agree, I don't like the boolean flags

RE: [lang] StringUtils.split ignores empty items (Bugzilla bug# 22692)

2004-07-07 Thread Henri Yandell
Commons Developers List' Subject: RE: [lang] StringUtils.split ignores empty items (Bugzilla bug# 22692) Gary didn't like splitPreserve. I originally suggested splitPreserve so that's fine by me. I could also go with splitAll. And I agree, I don't like the boolean flags either

RE: [lang] StringUtils.split ignores empty items (Bugzilla bug# 22692)

2004-07-07 Thread Gary Gregory
Nope, not offensive at all from my end. I just wanted to make my point on the name bit. Email, even with corny emoticons, can be difficult to read, especially when you have never met someone IRL. Happy Gary I'm sorry if my Gary doesn't like comment was offensive. It sure wasn't meant to be,

RE: [lang] StringUtils.split ignores empty items (Bugzilla bug# 22692)

2004-07-06 Thread Steven Caswell
Subject: Re: [lang] StringUtils.split ignores empty items (Bugzilla bug# 22692) Although splitPreserve isn't a great name, I can't thinkn of a better one. This does seem to be requested functionality for a utils class in addition to Tokenizer, so +1. Stephen - Original

Re: [lang] StringUtils.split ignores empty items (Bugzilla bug# 22692)

2004-07-06 Thread Stephen Colebourne
] StringUtils.split ignores empty items (Bugzilla bug# 22692) Indeed not a great name. splitPreserve does not tell you what it is preserving. How about: - Instead of splitPreserve, split with boolean argument. - Use another word: Keep or Include or With, with or without what is preserved: - splitKeep

RE: [lang] StringUtils.split ignores empty items (Bugzilla bug# 22692)

2004-07-06 Thread Steven Caswell
, 2004 12:45 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: RE: [lang] StringUtils.split ignores empty items (Bugzilla bug# 22692) Indeed not a great name. splitPreserve does not tell you what it is preserving. How about: - Instead of splitPreserve, split with boolean argument

RE: [lang] StringUtils.split ignores empty items (Bugzilla bug# 22692)

2004-07-06 Thread Gary Gregory
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 12:45 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: RE: [lang] StringUtils.split ignores empty items (Bugzilla bug# 22692) Indeed not a great name. splitPreserve does not tell you what it is preserving. How about

RE: [lang] StringUtils.split ignores empty items (Bugzilla bug# 22692)

2004-07-06 Thread Michael Heuer
To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' Subject: RE: [lang] StringUtils.split ignores empty items (Bugzilla bug# 22692) Gary didn't like splitPreserve. I originally suggested splitPreserve so that's fine by me. I could also go with splitAll. And I agree, I don't like the boolean flags

RE: [lang] StringUtils.split ignores empty items (Bugzilla bug# 22692)

2004-07-06 Thread Henri Yandell
Developers List Subject: Re: [lang] StringUtils.split ignores empty items (Bugzilla bug# 22692) StringUtils currently has no boolean flags in method args, and I want to keep it that way. splitAll? 'Split the string keeping All the tokens' splitPreserve

Re: [lang] StringUtils.split ignores empty items (Bugzilla bug# 22692)

2004-07-05 Thread Stephen Colebourne
Although splitPreserve isn't a great name, I can't thinkn of a better one. This does seem to be requested functionality for a utils class in addition to Tokenizer, so +1. Stephen - Original Message - From: Steven Caswell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regarding the solution for