Re: [math] re: move to Apache Commons

2003-11-15 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 14 Nov 2003, at 04:28, Brent Worden wrote: -Original Message- From: Phil Steitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 12:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [math] re: move to Apache Commons snip I think that it is to accommodate the framework and non-Java

Re: [math] re: move to Apache Commons

2003-11-15 Thread Phil Steitz
Brent Worden wrote: -Original Message- From: Phil Steitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 12:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [math] re: move to Apache Commons I have always maintained that the simple lang-like extension stuff fits in Jakarta Commons, while

RE: [math] re: move to Apache Commons

2003-11-13 Thread Brent Worden
-Original Message- From: Phil Steitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 12:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [math] re: move to Apache Commons I have always maintained that the simple lang-like extension stuff fits in Jakarta Commons, while the math

Re: [math] re: move to Apache Commons

2003-11-12 Thread J.Pietschmann
Phil Steitz wrote: Recent comments have suggested that Java may not be suitable for numerical computation (a view that I do not share) Well, I think this should be put into context. Let's examine some approaches to numerical computation: 1. A cleanly designed library of commonly used, somewhat low