Are there plans to replace JOCL with Digester for this release ?
We're using DBCP with JOCL for an application which will go to
production soon. And we'd like to know the road-map for moving it to
digester.
As it's designed now (or as it was a month ago), pool and DBCP are
not very
The classes don't follow the javabean conventions,
That's not true. AFAIK, every mutable property in
org.apache.commons.pool.impl.* follows the getProperty/setProperty
conventions, and always have.
As it's designed now (or as it was a month ago), pool
and DBCP are not very Digester
That's not true. AFAIK, every mutable property in
org.apache.commons.pool.impl.* follows the getProperty/setProperty
conventions, and always have.
Another important piece of the conventions is that all beans have a
zero-arg constructor, which the core pool classes don't have.
As I said, it was
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Waldhoff, Rodney wrote:
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 12:26:54 -0500
From: Waldhoff, Rodney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [pool] 1.0 release soon
Any
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 5:49 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: [pool] 1.0 release soon
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Waldhoff, Rodney wrote:
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 12:26:54 -0500
From: Waldhoff, Rodney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED
R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 2:49 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: [pool] 1.0 release soon
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Waldhoff, Rodney wrote:
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 12:26:54 -0500
From: Waldhoff, Rodney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta
In the event maven and gump are not cooperating, I did make the change
to jakarta-turbine-fulcrum.
john mcnally
On Fri, 2002-05-03 at 10:26, Waldhoff, Rodney wrote:
Any remaining to-dos for a 1.0 commons-pool release? My list is done. I
just removed the KeyedObjectPool.numActive and
Developers List
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: [pool] 1.0 release soon
In the event maven and gump are not cooperating, I did make the change
to jakarta-turbine-fulcrum.
john mcnally
On Fri, 2002-05-03 at 10:26, Waldhoff
If anyone is strongly bothered by ObjectPool.numIdle() and
ObjectPool.numActive() versus the getXXX() style, now might be the right
time to change it, although it may already be too late depending upon how
broadly pool is being used.
How about adding getXxx() versions, implement the old
Better now than later.
-Original Message-
From: Waldhoff, Rodney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 3:05 PM
To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List'
Subject: RE: [pool] 1.0 release soon (was RE: [pool]
PROPOSAL: add collecting of statistics to pool
10 matches
Mail list logo
