On 24 Nov 2004, at 17:50, Rory Winston wrote:
Agreed. I think a better long-term solution would be to include the
subcomponent name in the mail templates. Is it possible to do this
going forward? Who administers the BZ installation?
a little bit of a sore point, this one. apache infrastructure is
Like Martin, I appreciate Emmanuel's effort and initiative ... and am
whining that I have to untrain my Bayesian filter that Bugzilla
messages on commons-dev are spam :-).
Craig
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 10:59:15 -0800, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 02:48:21 +0800, Co
Whoopsit must be later than I thought...sorry.
Kudos to Emmanuel
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 10:59:15 -0800, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 02:48:21 +0800, Corey Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well I like everyone else was spammed. That said, (i may be a
> > min
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 02:48:21 +0800, Corey Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well I like everyone else was spammed. That said, (i may be a
> minority here, but), I am thankfull to Martin.
I suspect Emmanuel is the one you mean to thank. All I did was whine
after the fact and suggest other options
Well I like everyone else was spammed. That said, (i may be a
minority here, but), I am thankfull to Martin.
Good Job, good initiative, and as a side issue, the spam may actually
cause us to do something about this issue for the long term.
Just my 2 cents.
-Corey
---
, Inc.
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx
- Original Message -
From: "Emmanuel Bourg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: Bug report normalization
Martin Cooper wrote:
I&
t daily
stats on how we are doing?
Eric
> -Original Message-
> From: Emmanuel Bourg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 6:03 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: Bug report normalization
>
>
> Martin Cooper wrote:
>
>
Martin Cooper wrote:
I'm sure this has done wonders for the utility of the mailing list archives...
I'm not trying to justify myself but the mail archives are already
spammed by the CVS commits and the GUMP reports... Reading the archive
is definitely not the best way to follow the discussions on
Agreed. I think a better long-term solution would be to include the
subcomponent name in the mail templates. Is it possible to do this going
forward? Who administers the BZ installation?
Cheers,
Rory
Martin Cooper wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 16:54:50 +0100, Emmanuel Bourg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
Who can remove the jelly component ?
(and probably any jira based component)
thanks
paul
Le 24 nov. 04, à 16:54, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit :
Hi all, my apologies for the Bugzilla spam, I normalized the summaries
for all open bug reports (except the jelly ones). The summaries are
now prefixed with th
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 16:54:50 +0100, Emmanuel Bourg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all, my apologies for the Bugzilla spam, I normalized the summaries
> for all open bug reports (except the jelly ones). The summaries are now
> prefixed with the component name, this should help filtering the mails
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
