Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: Java5izing commons/lang [all][lang]
Hi Gary and others,
I get it. So the core lang package has to be usable by anyone who does
not have all the nice features the later versions offer. Makes sense.
That said, how about having extensions, at least for J5
We have already had a similar discussion on JDK5-izing
commons-collections.
Collections are quite special considering the introduction of generics
to Java. But what about lang?
When it comes time, the existing classes/interface should be
genericized, so that it has minimal impact on
Are there that many areas within [lang] that would
benefit from JDK1.5?
One of the key purposes of [lang] is providing JDK1.5
features to earlier JDKs.
Stephen
--- Stuart, Ashwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have already had a similar discussion on
JDK5-izing
commons-collections.
Hello Ashwin:
I doubt that making [lang] dependent on Java 5 will have soon. I think
the base requirement is still 1.2.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Stuart, Ashwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 10:23 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject:
-Original Message-
From: Gary Gregory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 2:50 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: Java5izing commons/lang [all][lang]
Hello Ashwin:
I doubt that making [lang] dependent on Java 5 will have soon. I think
the base requirement
