Re: Svn migration - subclipse, scheduling, binaries

2004-12-20 Thread Henri Yandell
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 08:02:14 -0500, Tim O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. Scheduling: If we go forward with this migration, we need to do this when everyone is available both so we can migrate successfully and so that we can have a proper 72 hour vote window. Doing this right before a

RE: Svn migration - subclipse, scheduling, binaries

2004-12-20 Thread Tim O'Brien
Yes, the intent isn't to leave anyone behind. I just noticed that infrastructure changes don't have a section in the guideline proposal: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/proposal.html#decisions/items From: Henri Yandell well. Was thinking this qualifies again as a release majority vote. At