I'm +1 on the promotion.
On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 17:54:11 -0800, Kevin A. Burton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Subject:
>
> Hey gang.
>
> I'd like to propose that we move FeedParser into commons proper. The main
> personal requirement for this is that I want to do a 0.5 release for my
> CodeCon
> t
Total +1 on this. Now that the ROME developers want to work on a unified
API and JavaOne speech this should make working with them much easier.
Brad
At 05:54 PM 2/2/2005, you wrote:
Subject:
Hey gang.
I'd like to propose that we move FeedParser into commons proper. The main
personal requirement
Brad Neuberg wrote:
Total +1 on this. Now that the ROME developers want to work on a
unified API and JavaOne speech this should make working with them much
easier.
It will also mean that you don't have to give me anonCVS diffs anymore
and can commit by yourself ;)
Kevin
--
Use Rojo (RSS/Atom ag
+1 for promoting feedparser to commons proper
-0 for dedicated mailing list, httpclient got one during their major
refactoring mail storm when they were sending dozens of mails every
day. It was a practical solution but not good community wise.
I would advice only to get a separate mailing list i
Dirk,
from what I can see feedparser seems more like a top level java
project than a commons one. Maybe it should go straight from the
sandbox to jakarta?
On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 08:21:42 +0100, Dirk Verbeeck
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 for promoting feedparser to commons proper
>
> -0 for dedi
Dion Gillard wrote:
Dirk,
from what I can see feedparser seems more like a top level java
project than a commons one. Maybe it should go straight from the
sandbox to jakarta?
What I'm worried about this is that we might be a bit early for a top
level java project. We only have 3 developers and
--
> From: Kevin A. Burton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 1:18 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: VOTE: FeedParser move to Commons Proper...
>
> Dion Gillard wrote:
>
> >Dirk,
> >
> >from what I can see feedpars
.
+1
To promote feedparser out of commons at this point might create the
possibility for another BCEL.
Tim O'Brien
-Original Message-
From: Kevin A. Burton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 1:18 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: VOTE: FeedPa
Tim O'Brien, please, sorry by my stupidity, but how do you means with:
> To promote feedparser out of commons at this point might create the
> possibility for another "BCEL".
?
Woody
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BCEL was (until recently) a dormant project, no active committers
around anymore to respond to questions / commit bug fixes.
Because BCEL is at jakarta level this was/is problematic.
The Jakarta PMC cannot provide oversight if no committers are present
and on the PMC so this would main the end of
+1
On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 01:54, Kevin A. Burton wrote:
> I also want to be able to give out SVN commit to additional developers
> as they
> come on board.
i'm going to assume that 'give out' is just an inaccurate choice of
words. new committers can be proposed once feedparser is in the common
robert burrell donkin wrote:
+1
OK... great. Thanks guys. So does this mean I'm a go? I've had more
than 3 +1s and no -1s .
I'd like to move to commons proper soon as I'd ideally like to do a
0.5.0 release prior to my codecon talk on Sat Feb 12th. No pressure
though ;)
Is it possible t
On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 01:37, Kevin A. Burton wrote:
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
>
> >+1
> >
> >
> >
> OK... great. Thanks guys. So does this mean I'm a go? I've had more
> than 3 +1s and no -1s .
i find it best to put a time limit on a vote at the start (so that
everyone knows when it's
13 matches
Mail list logo