Depends what the problem is. And, apparently, the 'problem' wasn't in commons,
or commons-sandbox, but in avalon.
However, I gathered that part of the problem was code hosted by Apache that
wasn't formally adopted by Apache. If that's the case, leaving projects in
sandbox for long periods of ti
Steve Downey wrote:
What about an automatic sunset on sandbox code? 3 months after initial commit
it's either voted in as a project somewhere, or removed?
3 months of inactivity maybe, not 3 months from initial commit. Some
code bases may require a long time to generate the necessary communit
> i think that we in the commons needs to take the supervision of the
> sandbox more seriously. since it's part of our subproject, we need to take
> responsibility for the contents of the sandbox and ensure that this
> facility is used correctly.
>
> (if we could get the volunteers) one way we coul
> > Big +1. Until the members to committers ratio can improve,
> the only
> > way
> > to pick up the slack is for EVERYONE to be watching out for
> this type of
> > thing.
>
> +1
>
> i think that we in the commons needs to take the supervision of the
> sandbox more seriously. since it's par
