Re: [vfs] FileSystemManager construction rethought

2004-06-28 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Rami Ojares wrote: Full acceptance with satisfaction guaranteed. DelegatingFileSystemOptionsBuilder is our friend. FileSystemOptions fso = new FileSystemOptions(); DelegatingFileSystemOptionsBuilder delegate = new DelegatingFileSystemOptionsBuilder(VFS.getManager()); delegate.setConfigString(fs

Re: [vfs] FileSystemManager construction rethought

2004-06-24 Thread Rami Ojares
> But i have to say i dont like to add all those configuration stuff to > the uri - maybe this might be a handy place, but adding e.g. path > elements like those in your example might be a real pain. It might be > really hard to construct a correct uri. I agree. It was just an example. > Now

Re: [vfs] FileSystemManager construction rethought

2004-06-24 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Rami Ojares wrote: All you have written seems right - hard work ;-) But if one would tell them for example sftp://id=/path/to/.private.key;knownHosts=some/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/usr/local/var then that would just override the providers defaults set from the configuration file. But i have to say i don

Re: [vfs] FileSystemManager construction rethought

2004-06-24 Thread Rami Ojares
> Now the configuration (file) can be passed as path, File, FileObject, DOM or > whatever. Here the word "Now" does not mean that "now the implementation is ..." It means "In general it is possible ..." - rami - To unsubscribe

Re: [vfs] FileSystemManager construction rethought

2004-06-24 Thread Rami Ojares
Hi Mario, Here I have listed my current understanding of VFS in connection with the configuration issues. Could you please correct any mistakes you find. - Manager contains FileProviders - Manager supports all schemas for which it has configured a provider - FileProviders create a FileSystem the

Re: [vfs] FileSystemManager construction rethought

2004-06-23 Thread Rami Ojares
> I tried to replace the parsing of the xml file by commons-digester & > beanutils but failed as it comes to the point to add those dependencies > to vfs. Other people vetoed against it (Too large jars) That is a shame. But isn't it so that we should first come up with a configuration structure

RE: [vfs] FileSystemManager construction rethought

2004-06-23 Thread Jörg Schaible
Mario Ivankovits wrote on Wednesday, June 23, 2004 9:48 AM: > Hello Rami, > > here are some thoughts about "configuration": > > *) GlobalConfiguration: > As you have seen, the StandardFileSystemManager currently uses an xml > file to configure the system. I tried to replace the parsing of the >

Re: [vfs] FileSystemManager construction rethought

2004-06-23 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hello Rami, here are some thoughts about "configuration": *) GlobalConfiguration: As you have seen, the StandardFileSystemManager currently uses an xml file to configure the system. I tried to replace the parsing of the xml file by commons-digester & beanutils but failed as it comes to the point

Re: [vfs] FileSystemManager construction rethought

2004-06-22 Thread Rami Ojares
Here are some small changes that I came across when making the changes compilable. I changed configure method to init because there was already private configure(String) method in DefaultFileSystemManager but the existing init method was without arguments. I saw also that there is quite a lot of