On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 01:37, Kevin A. Burton wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
+1
OK... great. Thanks guys. So does this mean I'm a go? I've had more
than 3 +1s and no -1s .
i find it best to put a time limit on a vote at the start (so that
everyone knows when it's finished).
+1
On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 01:54, Kevin A. Burton wrote:
snip
I also want to be able to give out SVN commit to additional developers
as they
come on board.
i'm going to assume that 'give out' is just an inaccurate choice of
words. new committers can be proposed once feedparser is in the
robert burrell donkin wrote:
+1
OK... great. Thanks guys. So does this mean I'm a go? I've had more
than 3 +1s and no -1s .
I'd like to move to commons proper soon as I'd ideally like to do a
0.5.0 release prior to my codecon talk on Sat Feb 12th. No pressure
though ;)
Is it possible
BCEL was (until recently) a dormant project, no active committers
around anymore to respond to questions / commit bug fixes.
Because BCEL is at jakarta level this was/is problematic.
The Jakarta PMC cannot provide oversight if no committers are present
and on the PMC so this would main the end
Dion Gillard wrote:
Dirk,
from what I can see feedparser seems more like a top level java
project than a commons one. Maybe it should go straight from the
sandbox to jakarta?
What I'm worried about this is that we might be a bit early for a top
level java project. We only have 3 developers and
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 1:18 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: VOTE: FeedParser move to Commons Proper...
Dion Gillard wrote:
Dirk,
from what I can see feedparser seems more like a top level
java project
than a commons one. Maybe
feedparser out of commons at this point might create the
possibility for another BCEL.
Tim O'Brien
-Original Message-
From: Kevin A. Burton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 1:18 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: VOTE: FeedParser move to Commons
Tim O'Brien, please, sorry by my stupidity, but how do you means with:
To promote feedparser out of commons at this point might create the
possibility for another BCEL.
?
Woody
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Total +1 on this. Now that the ROME developers want to work on a unified
API and JavaOne speech this should make working with them much easier.
Brad
At 05:54 PM 2/2/2005, you wrote:
Subject:
Hey gang.
I'd like to propose that we move FeedParser into commons proper. The main
personal
Brad Neuberg wrote:
Total +1 on this. Now that the ROME developers want to work on a
unified API and JavaOne speech this should make working with them much
easier.
It will also mean that you don't have to give me anonCVS diffs anymore
and can commit by yourself ;)
Kevin
--
Use Rojo (RSS/Atom
+1 for promoting feedparser to commons proper
-0 for dedicated mailing list, httpclient got one during their major
refactoring mail storm when they were sending dozens of mails every
day. It was a practical solution but not good community wise.
I would advice only to get a separate mailing list
Dirk,
from what I can see feedparser seems more like a top level java
project than a commons one. Maybe it should go straight from the
sandbox to jakarta?
On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 08:21:42 +0100, Dirk Verbeeck
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for promoting feedparser to commons proper
-0 for
Subject:
Hey gang.
I'd like to propose that we move FeedParser into commons proper. The main
personal requirement for this is that I want to do a 0.5 release for my
CodeCon
talk on the FeedParser on Feb 11.
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/feedparser/
We've been in the sandbox for 11
I'm +1 on the promotion.
On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 17:54:11 -0800, Kevin A. Burton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject:
Hey gang.
I'd like to propose that we move FeedParser into commons proper. The main
personal requirement for this is that I want to do a 0.5 release for my
CodeCon
talk on
14 matches
Mail list logo
