Re: [transaction] Brainstorming for 2.0

2007/3/4, Joerg Heinicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Oliver Zeigermann oliver.zeigermann at gmail.com writes: As explaining in my previous post, I have created a new TRANSACTION2 branch to contain initial code, docs, etc. for a future 2.0 version of Commons Transaction. If you have ideas,

[jira] Resolved: (FILEUPLOAD-128) move commons-fileupload to org.apache.commons.fileupload groupId in maven

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FILEUPLOAD-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jochen Wiedmann resolved FILEUPLOAD-128. Resolution: Fixed The groupId is already changed in the trunk. In other words,

[jira] Commented: (VFS-107) large Sftp transfers fail with OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12479298 ] Marty Lamb commented on VFS-107: Sorry, should have commented on this much sooner. That seems to work for me -

[jira] Commented: (VFS-116) Add Write capability to RandomAccessContent for all providers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12479302 ] Mario Ivankovits commented on VFS-116: -- Hi Andrew, thanks for the work, but I really require this as svn diff,

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Transaction 1.2

(rising from the ether) +1, looks good to me. Tim On 3/7/07, Daniel Florey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Go for it! +1 Daniel -- Forwarded message -- From: Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 04.03.2007 17:19 Subject: [VOTE] Release Commons Transaction 1.2

[jira] Updated: (VFS-116) Add Write capability to RandomAccessContent for all providers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Serff updated VFS-116: - Attachment: svn_diff.txt Attached the svn diff output. I just did it from the top level. If you need it

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[jexl] PROPOSAL: Extend Jexl to Support comparison operations between used-defined types

Please let me know if you aagree with the following proposal: I would like to extend Jexl to support comparison operations between used-defined types. This will enable Jexl to do comparison operations between user-define data types that are not a-priori comparable. For example, you will be able

Seeking opinion RE IP issues

First, my apologies for the cryptic subject line. I am woefully ignorant of the relevant legal jargon. Next, note that this email is NOT related to my various twitchings regarding bringing the Morph project to Apache. Moving on... I should qualify that I am a US citizen, so the relevant IP

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Transaction 1.2

Looks good to me: +1 Oliver Oliver Zeigermann wrote: Folks! Every now and then I make a new approach to finally release commons transaction 1.2. I have created a branch for the 1.2 version now TRANSACTION_1_2_RELEASE_BRANCH and a release tag TRANSACTION_1_2_RELEASE And have put up the rc4

Re: Seeking opinion RE IP issues

[snip] Hi Matt, I should qualify that I am a US citizen, so the relevant IP laws would apply AFAIK. Now let's say I write a Java library at work, but it's something that is (a) useful and (b) fairly unique, and I think it would make a nice commons component. Time passes, I change jobs, and

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Transaction 1.2

Hi Oliver, +1 build from source with Ant on Linux with Sun JDK 1.4, 1.5, and 1.6, with IBM JDK 1.4, Blackdown JDK 1.4 and JRockit 1.4. however, there were some problems with the build. Maven does not work, since it does not find its deps: = % === [EMAIL

[jira] Commented: (VFS-107) large Sftp transfers fail with OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12479501 ] Andrew Serff commented on VFS-107: -- Very cool. Thanks! Anyone know when v1.1 is slated to be released? I'm guess

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Transaction 1.2

Hi Jörg! Thanks for checking :) Concerning the maven build and the geronimo jars you are right. I had to change to repository to a local one to build it. This is supposed to be changed as soon as the geronimo jars are available over the standard repos. Cheers Oliver 2007/3/9, Jörg Schaible