[RESULT][VOTE][VFS] release commons-vfs 1.0 based on RC10

Hi! Sorry for being late, I am ill, though, it's getting better slowly :-( The vote to release commons-vfs 1.0 has passed. Details: +1 Henry Yandell Niall Pemberton Oliver Heger Jörg Schaible Rahul Akolkar Martin van den Bernt Phil Steitz Mario Ivankovits No other votes. The voting thread

Re: [RESULT][VOTE][VFS] release commons-vfs 1.0 based on RC10

On 12/28/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! Sorry for being late, I am ill, though, it's getting better slowly :-( The vote to release commons-vfs 1.0 has passed. Details: +1 Henry Yandell Niall Pemberton Oliver Heger Jörg Schaible Rahul Akolkar Martin van den Bernt Phil

Re: [RESULT][VOTE][VFS] release commons-vfs 1.0 based on RC10

Hi Henri! http://people.apache.org/~bayard/j-c-release/announce-email.html For what we currently do it really just means reminding us to explain what Commons Foo is and not assume the reader knows. Ok, thanks! Will try my best. Ciao, Mario

Re: [VOTE][VFS] release commons-vfs 1.0 based on RC10

Sorry I lost the top message, but I am +1 for releasing commons-vfs 1.0 based on RC10. Great work, Mario! Phil On 12/22/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 ;-) --- Mario - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [VOTE][VFS] release commons-vfs 1.0 based on RC10

On 12/19/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip/ [X] +1 I support this release [ ] +0 [ ] -0 [ ] -1 I do not support this release because... snap/ -Rahul - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE][VFS] release commons-vfs 1.0 based on RC10

Even though I like to see the record breaking effort of RC, while we are at it, really at an unbreakable level like 50 ;) However, there doesn't seem to be a reason to get you started on the 11th one, so +1 :) Mvgr, Martin Mario Ivankovits wrote: Hi! Please don't laugh ... I don't know if

Re: [VOTE][VFS] release commons-vfs 1.0 based on RC10

Hi! Sorry for having caused you some trouble the last time. It wasn't your fault, it was mine. You've done a great job! Ciao, Mario - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [VOTE][VFS] release commons-vfs 1.0 based on RC10

+1 ;-) --- Mario - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE][VFS] release commons-vfs 1.0 based on RC10

Hi Jörg! It's already changed for the m2 build. I don't know if its worth to relocate the m1. It's just that the M1 and M2 repos are kind of mirrored. Using the groupId in one repo means automatically the same for the M2 repo. But again, this is no stopper for the current release, we

Re: [VOTE][VFS] release commons-vfs 1.0 based on RC10

+1 Sorry for having caused you some trouble the last time. Oliver Mario Ivankovits wrote: Hi! Please don't laugh ... I don't know if there ever was a to be released Jakarta project with so many RCs. Be patient with me, I hope in the future we can go more straight forward. Changed: * The

Re: [VOTE][VFS] release commons-vfs 1.0 based on RC10

Hi Mario, Mario Ivankovits wrote: [snip] Although some tests are expected to fail, I have also a failure in the VirtualProviderTestCase that makes me wonder: /snip - --- Testcase:

[VOTE][VFS] release commons-vfs 1.0 based on RC10

Hi! Please don't laugh ... I don't know if there ever was a to be released Jakarta project with so many RCs. Be patient with me, I hope in the future we can go more straight forward. Changed: * The ant build succeeded, but in the resulting jar the LICENSE.txt was missing (only NOTICE.txt is

Re: [VOTE][VFS] release commons-vfs 1.0 based on RC10

+1. Pgp good, md5 good, builds fine (a few errors, but readme says they are expected). copyright looks good. Lots of optional dependencies specified correctly, so looks good for maven repo's. Hen On 12/19/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! Please don't laugh ... I don't know

Re: [VOTE][VFS] release commons-vfs 1.0 based on RC10

+1 Niall On 12/19/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! Please don't laugh ... I don't know if there ever was a to be released Jakarta project with so many RCs. Be patient with me, I hope in the future we can go more straight forward. Changed: * The ant build succeeded, but in

Re: [VOTE][VFS] release commons-vfs 1.0 based on RC10

Hi Mario, first a question to all: Is it consensus that we use groupId commons-vfs? I just wondered that it was taken for the first release, since we'll switch to org.apache.commons ... But since we have to switch/relocate a lot of projects, one more does not really matter :) Mario Ivankovits

Re: [VOTE][VFS] release commons-vfs 1.0 based on RC10

Hi Jörg! first a question to all: Is it consensus that we use groupId commons-vfs? I just wondered that it was taken for the first release, since we'll switch to org.apache.commons ... It's already changed for the m2 build. I don't know if its worth to relocate the m1. But since we have

RE: [VOTE][VFS] release commons-vfs 1.0 based on RC10

Mario Ivankovits wrote on Wednesday, December 20, 2006 7:59 AM: Hi Jörg! first a question to all: Is it consensus that we use groupId commons-vfs? I just wondered that it was taken for the first release, since we'll switch to org.apache.commons ... It's already changed for the m2 build.