DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17432] - '100-continue' response times out unexpectedly

2003-03-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17432. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17487] - waitForResponse is using busy wait

2003-03-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17487. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: Commons httpclient API for Slide

2003-03-06 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
Hi Portia 'Expect: continue' handshake which appears to not get along well with your application can be easily disabled on individual POST or PUT method basis. However, I am not familiar with Slide at all, and therefore I can tell if you could change this setting without having to recompile

Re: Cookies

2003-03-06 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
Hi Steve On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 17:00, Stephen Found wrote: Hi Oleg, I hope you don't mind me emailing you directly but I could not find any way of submitting suggestions to the excellent Commons HttpClient project and I notice that you are one of the main contributors. Of course, I do

Re: To all those who have been experiencing problems with 'expect:100-continue' stuff

2003-03-06 Thread Simon Roberts
Oleg, The 'expect: 100-continue' related code has been significantly refactored I am no longer experiencing the timeout problem (everything works well when sending the expect-100 header). However, my HTTP server (Jetty) seems to be still sending HTTP/1.1 100 Continue when the Expect header is

Re: To all those who have been experiencing problems with 'expect:100-continue' stuff

2003-03-06 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
Hi Simon On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 22:24, Simon Roberts wrote: Oleg, I am no longer experiencing the timeout problem (everything works well when sending the expect-100 header). Glad to hear that. However, my HTTP server (Jetty) seems to be still sending HTTP/1.1 100 Continue when the Expect

Re: To all those who have been experiencing problems with'expect:100-continue' stuff

2003-03-06 Thread Simon Roberts
I'm am following this up with the Jetty community. Keep me in the feedback loop, though. If there's anything I could help Jetty folks with, just let me know FYI http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=699011group_id=732 2atid=107322

Empty cookie problem

2003-03-06 Thread Tom Samplonius
I have a server that sets a bunch of empty cookies: 2003/03/06 16:28:52:055 PST [DEBUG] wire - - Set-Cookie: list%2ESince=; path=/[\r][\n] 2003/03/06 16:28:52:055 PST [DEBUG] wire - - Set-Cookie: search%2EPhoneSDA=; path=/[\r][\n] On subsequent requests, httpclient attaches these cookies

Problem with MultipartPostMethod via HTTPS

2003-03-06 Thread TANAKA Yuui
I tried to send a file to a servlet with MultipartPostMethod via HTTPS, then I get: java.net.SocketException: Connection reset at java.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.java:168) at com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.InputRecord.a(DashoA6275) at

Re: Problem with MultipartPostMethod via HTTPS

2003-03-06 Thread Michael Becke
Multipart posts with SSL should work. The only strange thing I noticed in your example is that the file part is never added to the post method. Is this what's happening in the real code? If so, this could be the source of the problem. If not, a wire log of the problem would help. Take

Re: Problem with MultipartPostMethod via HTTPS

2003-03-06 Thread TANAKA Yuui
Sorry, the code I wrote in my previous post is just an example I edit. Here is the real code: public class Main { String host = 192.168.0.52; String scheme = https; int port = 443; String fileSendUrl = /order/test;

Re: Problem with MultipartPostMethod via HTTPS

2003-03-06 Thread Michael Becke
I'm not exactly sure what's going wrong here. It seems that the connection is being closed/reused on the either the client or server side before the entire response is read. I tried your code on my machine at home and it worked well. I am guessing the problem is either with the version

Re: patch comments

2003-03-06 Thread Jeffrey Dever
go4it Michael Becke wrote: Are there any comment for or against the following patches? the patch attached to: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17563 and: Begin forwarded message: From: Michael Becke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat Mar 1, 2003 12:36:02 PM US/Eastern To: