RE: read timeout with persistent connection

Ortwin Glück write: > There is an option to disable stale checking. Thanks, though turning stale checking off doesn't change the outcome - the readResponse call still blocks for 30s. I don't think it's the stale checking that's causing the problem, but for some reason the server ignores or closes

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24309] - MultiThreadedHttpConnectionManager daemon Thread never GC'd

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24504] - Cannot create a document that has accent characters (Latin) in it's name

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24504] - Cannot create a document that has accent characters (Latin) in it's name

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: read timeout with persistent connection

There is an option to disable stale checking. Matthew McGowan wrote: Any ideas how I go about fixing this? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

read timeout with persistent connection

Greetings, With HttpClient, I'm using the MultiThreadedHttpConnectionManager, with all timeout values set to 30s, and I'm seeing a problem against a server that discards unused connections after several minutes. It seems the connection close isn't detected by the HttpConnection.isStale() method, w

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24352] - NLTM Proxy and basic host authorization

Christian Kohlschütter wrote: I own the copyright for this code and I am willing to contribute / publish it under the conditions of the Apache License. Thanks a lot! I will check it in on the 2.0 branch since it is related to a 2.0 bug. As soon as it is ready we can promote it to CVS HEAD. Od

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24352] - NLTM Proxy and basic host authorization

On Tuesday 18 November 2003 11:53, Ortwin Glück wrote: > Christian Kohlschütter wrote: > > On Tuesday 18 November 2003 11:26, Ortwin Glück wrote: > >>Christian Kohlschütter wrote: > >>>Please have a look at the latest version (see > >>>http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24352] - NLTM Proxy and basic host authorization

Christian Kohlschütter wrote: On Tuesday 18 November 2003 11:26, Ortwin Glück wrote: Christian Kohlschütter wrote: Please have a look at the latest version (see http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=9093 ). It is more abstract than the BadHTTPServer example for Bug 2456

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24352] - NLTM Proxy and basic host authorization

On Tuesday 18 November 2003 11:26, Ortwin Glück wrote: > Christian Kohlschütter wrote: > > Please have a look at the latest version (see > > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=9093 > > ). > > > > It is more abstract than the BadHTTPServer example for Bug 24560 and > > tr

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24560] - HttpClient loops endlessly while trying to retrieve status line

Christian, Feel free to make changes to the patch that you deem necessary. Once you think it is ready, I suggest we once again ask all the interested parties to raise their objections and express concerns. If there's no significant opposition to the final revision of the patch, and it is OKed by

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24352] - NLTM Proxy and basic host authorization

Christian Kohlschütter wrote: Please have a look at the latest version (see http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=9093 ). It is more abstract than the BadHTTPServer example for Bug 24560 and truly test independent. What sort of file is that? It seems binary... -

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24352] - NLTM Proxy and basic host authorization

On Monday 17 November 2003 20:33, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: > [Disregard my previous post. I responded to a wrong message by mistake] > > Odi, > That would be REALLY cool! A simple authenticating proxy (or a proxy > that could effectively 'fake' popular authentication schemes) would be a > very much

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24560] - HttpClient loops endlessly while trying to retrieve status line

On Monday 17 November 2003 21:05, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: > I have not found any mentioning of "unexpected content" in the RFC, so > this is another reason why I would be a bit cautious about throwing a > protocol exception. It would suffice to spit out a warning, drop the > connection and move o

Re: Does HttpClient decompress compressed HTTP transfers?

It'd be rather easy to wrap the streams in a DeflaterOutputStream or an InflaterInputStream. Of course, due to limitations in Java's deflate compression, one must extend DeflaterOutputStream to allow true stream deflation. The problem with the current implementation is that there is no way to

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24352] - NLTM Proxy and basic host authorization

Michael Becke wrote: Odi, Eric, I think a combination of these techniques would be great. One level to handle the socket management(as Odi outlined) and another to handle the content creation/validation (Eric's idea). These two methods in tandem should be sufficient to mimic any combination o