Eric Bloch wrote:
Which JVM? I usualliy bench against Sun's; ( JRockit benched worse last
I tried it (it was a year ago or more))
Sun and IBM are usually a little faster than Blackdown. JRockit has
'ThinThreads' which may be a good thing here.
---
Vimarsh Vasavada wrote:
Hello all.
We have following challenge to address :
1. We have 2 JBOSS Servers, say, S1 and S2
2. There will be 1,00,000 distinct-client-threads fired to
S1/TalkToS2.jsp/
3. S1 will have hence virtually 1,00,000-threads attempting to exchange
request/response with S2 only
Hello all.
We have following challenge to address :
1. We have 2 JBOSS Servers, say, S1 and S2
2. There will be 1,00,000 distinct-client-threads fired to
S1/TalkToS2.jsp/
3. S1 will have hence virtually 1,00,000-threads attempting to exchange
request/response with S2 only.
Now questions :
1. how d
I'm talking linux 1p and 2p systems running 2.4 kernels. I'll give 2.6
systems a try!
Which JVM? I usualliy bench against Sun's; ( JRockit benched worse last
I tried it (it was a year ago or more))
Thanks!
-Eric
Ortwin Glück wrote:
Eric Bloch wrote:
My believe (and experience) is that y
Eric Bloch wrote:
My believe (and experience) is that you'll run into java thread
scheduling delays (cpu bottlenecks) before you should hit connection
limits on most servers, as long as you set these values reasonably high.
-Eric
Not necessarily. On a SMP System using a 2.6 Kernel this should
My believe (and experience) is that you'll run into java thread
scheduling delays (cpu bottlenecks) before you should hit connection
limits on most servers, as long as you set these values reasonably high.
-Eric
Ortwin Glück wrote:
Thinh,
I think those parameters can drastically affect the
Thinh,
I think those parameters can drastically affect the performance of your
system. I suggest you draw a chart of your system and fill in figures
about computational load, number of connections between machines and
traffic with the estimated number of users. Perform some load tests to
get a
Hi Thinh,
I assume you are talking about the number of connections for the
MultiThreadedHttpConnectionManager. There is no real formula that I'm
aware of for the number of connections to use. I would suggest load
testing, and seeing what works best. We would certainly be interested
in any r
Hello.
We have a firewall, load balancer, 4 web servers, 6 app servers, 2
database servers, and 2 specialty web servers/app servers on our
production environment. We average 20,000 users a day. We are expecting
to get North of 100,000 users a day once our marketing campaign launches.
The spe
All right. I'll look into the problem this weekend and apply a fix.
Oleg
-Original Message-
From: Ortwin Glück [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 11:37
To: Commons HttpClient Project
Subject: Re: The httpclient.wire log.
Olge,
Geir is right. It is a bug to use a
Olge,
Geir is right. It is a bug to use an encoded reader since that will
convert all bytes not used by the encoding to question marks. His patch
fixes the problem. My idea was just to provide sort of nicer output.
Odi
Kalnichevski, Oleg wrote:
Geir,
The wirelog displays (is intedned to displ
Geir,
The wirelog displays (is intedned to display) what gets physically transmitted across
the wire escaping all potentially non-printable characters, hence the US-ASCII
charset. What you see is what you get, sort of. I suspect that this is not just the
problem with the wire log display. I won
Hi again.
> >
> > I want the log to be: "[0xc3][0xa6][0xc3][0xb8][0xc3][0xa5]"
> I think, just using the default platform encoding is as bad as using
> US-ASCII because it does not reflect was is *really* sent over the wire.
If you look closely, you will see that this is _not:_ the default chara
Geir H. Pettersen wrote:
Hi,
I have been using the commons httpclient successfully since rc1. Great work
guys! This is the best client that I ever have used in java.
Thanks for the flowers, Geir!
The httpclient.wire log is fantastic, but there is something there that
bothers me a bit. Before th
Michael,
I am using the latest version. I have found the solution : use
MultiThreadedHttpConnectionManager. Before that I was using the default
Simple.
Paul
Michael Becke wrote:
Hi Paul,
Sounds like you are using an older version of HttpClient. I suggest
upgrading to 2.0.
Mike
On
Hi,
I have been using the commons httpclient successfully since rc1. Great work
guys! This is the best client that I ever have used in java.
The httpclient.wire log is fantastic, but there is something there that
bothers me a bit. Before the characters are written to log, they are decoded
with "U
16 matches
Mail list logo