DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31378] - Move multipart request to a new RequestEntity type

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31378] - Move multipart request to a new RequestEntity type

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Performance

Sounds good to me. Is there anything else we want to sneak in at the same time? If I don't hear any objections or ideas for other things to include in 2.0.2 I'll call for a vote in the morning. Also, it would be nice to have some specifics about the performance increase to include in the

Re: ATTN Open-source projects using HttpClient

I have no problem with posting to the dev lists for these other projects. My feeling is that we should keep it friendly and just encourage people to have a look at 3.0 and then submit their requests/ideas to httpclient-dev or bugzilla. Once we've done that I think we'll just have to be happy

Re: client-certificate authentication

Mark, We do not have a full-blown tutorial on this subject as SSL authentication is basically is out of HttpClient scope. This sample code does, however, have extensive javadocs on the matter. http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-commons/httpclient/src/contrib/org/apache/commons/httpclient/

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27298] - Deprecate and replace SimpleHttpConnection with the SimpleHttpServer based testing framework

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

client-certificate authentication

Hi, Is there any documentation on how to do client-certificate authentication with HTTPClient? I didn't see anything in the SSL docs on the web site or via Google. Thanks, Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For ad

Re: ATTN Open-source projects using HttpClient

Thanks, Adam Should we decide to go on a spamming spree, these may also become potential victims ;-) Oleg On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 20:37, Adam R. B. Jack wrote: > > > On Mon, 2004-09-20 at 22:50, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: > > > > As far as I know the following projects rely on HttpClient 2.0 as a

Re: ATTN Open-source projects using HttpClient

> > On Mon, 2004-09-20 at 22:50, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: > > > As far as I know the following projects rely on HttpClient 2.0 as a > > > required or optional dependency > > > > > > * Apache Jakarta Slide (http://jakarta.apache.org/slide/) > > > * Apache Jakarta Cactus (http://jakarta.apache.org/ca

Re: ATTN Open-source projects using HttpClient

Folks, shall we try to approach members of the projects listed below (except Slide) directly? Apparently no one of them is monitoring this list. How does everyone feel about it? Oleg On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 20:43, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: > Sadly, no one seems to care. What do we do? > > Oleg >

Re: Help required - in setting the Socket Timeout - setSoTimeOut - HttpClient - commons

Raghavan, I am not entirely sure I understood the problem. However, here's a few general recommendations: (1) Upgrade to HttpClient 2.0.1. 2.0a3 had a nasty bug you want fixed. PR #26500 - Socket timeout is now correctly set on open connections http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=

Re: Performance

Great news indeed. The reported performance boost does justify cutting a new release. Folks, how do you all feel about releasing HttpClient 2.0.2? Oleg On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 00:38, Eric Johnson wrote: > And I've finally gotten test results back from the appropriate people here. > > In our test l

RE: Proxy

A...there we go, my code did not include that line. Thank you very much. Rudy -Original Message- From: Roland Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 September 2004 15:19 To: Commons HttpClient Project Subject: RE: Proxy Hello Rudy, does your application include this line from the

RE: Proxy

Hello Rudy, does your application include this line from the sample? client.getHostConfiguration().setHost(LOGON_SITE, LOGON_PORT, "http"); If not, that is the explanation. Make sure that you re-use one HttpClient object for the requests, or that the default is set for each object you create.

RE: Proxy

Oh cant relative urls be used?? I thought they could as the example for form login uses them: PostMethod authpost = new PostMethod("/servlet/SessionServlet"); // Prepare login parameters NameValuePair action = new NameValuePair("action", "login"); NameValuePair url

RE: Proxy

Hello Rudy, unfortunately, you did not tell us the URLs you are actually accessing. My guess is that you take them from a web page, and that one of them is a relative URL starting with / instead of http://... cheers, Roland "Hentzen, Rudy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 28.09.2004 14:12 Please respo

Help required - in setting the Socket Timeout - setSoTimeOut - HttpClient - commons

Hi Everyone Iam Raghavan R, using the jakarta - commons - HttpClient utility viz, commons-httpclient-2.0-rc3.jar, commons-logging.jar, commons-logging-api.jar. In our project we have class which uses - HttpClient to create secure connection. The question is 'Iam getting connection:timed out

RE: Proxy

Hi, I have created a method that carries out post commands and returns the response body. It is called doPostMethod and my usage is shown below: if (isProxySetUp()) { //sets up the proxy // Create a method instance of amazon.co.uk site. responseBody = doGetMethod(sellYourStuffURL

Re: Performance

This is very good news, Eric! Thanks a lot. Eric Johnson wrote: And I've finally gotten test results back from the appropriate people here. In our test lab, between HttpClient 2.0.1 and the nightly, we found a difference of about 4ms per request. As this was a live-test environment, with all of

RE: Proxy

Thank you very much, I was using port 8081, as it was given with the pac script. Your help has been very appreciated. Thanks again Rudy -Original Message- From: Ortwin Glück [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 September 2004 10:07 To: Commons HttpClient Project Subject: Re: Proxy He

Re: Proxy

Hentzen, Rudy wrote: Thanks for the swift reply, I have a proxy ip address, is that supported?? Rudy Sure. Just fill it into the example, where it says "myproxyhost" and 8080 is the TCP port. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO

RE: Proxy

Thanks for the swift reply, I have a proxy ip address, is that supported?? Rudy -Original Message- From: Ortwin Glück [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 September 2004 10:00 To: Commons HttpClient Project Subject: Re: Proxy Rudy, That URL only contains so-called PAC-Proxy code. This is

Re: Proxy

Rudy, That URL only contains so-called PAC-Proxy code. This is JavaScript that can tell web browsers which proxy to use for a particular URL. It is probably not the same host as the actual proxy! HttpClient currently does not support PAC code. You will need to figure out which proxy applies to

Proxy

Hi all, I am behind a corporate proxy and firewall and I am not sure how I can set this up in order to use the Http Client class to access web pages etc. The proxy url is and it requires a username and password: http://atlpx-ha.etrade.com:8081/accelerated_pac_base.pac Username and passwor

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14036] - MultipartPostMethod does not check for error messages

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu