Was there any significant overhead in using the 1.1 counterparts?
I did not do any performance measurements. Anyways, running on JVM 1.1 one can expect
quite a bit of a performance degradation compared to newer JVMs.
Vector and Hashtable are both synchronized which might be a performance
the
temptation of removing all of the deprecated legacy code in HttpClient.
Oleg
-Original Message-
From: Sam Berlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 16:57
To: Commons HttpClient Project
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Java 1.1.8 Status
Thanks for the reply
Thanks for the reply, Oleg.
Was the prior port mainly an exercise in converting
java.util.[CollectionClasses] to com.sun.java.util.[CollectionClasses]?
If that's the case (and perhaps with a few new methods sprinkled in)
maintaining a patch against the head would probably be the best and
not resist the temptation of
removing all of the deprecated legacy code in HttpClient.
Oleg
-Original Message-
From: Sam Berlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 16:57
To: Commons HttpClient Project
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Java 1.1.8 Status
Thanks
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 16:57
To: Commons HttpClient Project
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Java 1.1.8 Status
Thanks for the reply, Oleg.
Was the prior port mainly an exercise in converting
java.util.[CollectionClasses] to com.sun.java.util.[CollectionClasses]?
If that's
To: Commons HttpClient Project
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Java 1.1.8 Status
Thanks for the reply, Oleg.
Was the prior port mainly an exercise in converting
java.util.[CollectionClasses] to
com.sun.java.util.[CollectionClasses]? If that's the case (and
perhaps with a few new methods
]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 16:57
To: Commons HttpClient Project
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Java 1.1.8 Status
Thanks for the reply, Oleg.
Was the prior port mainly an exercise in converting
java.util.[CollectionClasses] to
com.sun.java.util.[CollectionClasses]? If that's the case
Hi Sam,
The fate of the JRE 1.1 port is currently not quite certain. We would
love the JRE 1.1 port to remain in the public domain (under Apache or
Apache compatible license), provided the it would be supported and kept
in sync with our official 2.0 branch. There is a pretty high likelihood
of
