RE: question re: cookies

2004-03-25 Thread Kalnichevski, Oleg
:39 To: Commons HttpClient Project Subject: RE: question re: cookies Ah yes, cookie headers that were manually set used to get overridden. As far as I remember, that changed a while back. Though I cannot tell whether the change went into 2.0 or only into the development branch. cheers, Roland

RE: question re: cookies

2004-03-25 Thread Roland Weber
HttpClient Project [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:RE: question re: cookies Gil, Roland Pluggable cookie policies as well as ability to manually set cookie headers are supported in the development branch only. For 2.0 there is no way around forking HttpClient Oleg

Re: question re: cookies

2004-03-24 Thread Roland Weber
reason why the cookie is set with that path. cheers, Roland Alvarez, Gil [EMAIL PROTECTED] 25.03.2004 07:37 Please respond to Commons HttpClient Project To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:question re: cookies Hi, we're porting some old code to use

RE: question re: cookies

2004-03-24 Thread Alvarez, Gil
: Roland Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 10:51 PM To: Commons HttpClient Project Subject: Re: question re: cookies Hello Gil, two options. If you only need to get the cookie for your application, then access the header directly instead of looking into the http state

RE: question re: cookies

2004-03-24 Thread Roland Weber
to Commons HttpClient Project To: Commons HttpClient Project [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:RE: question re: cookies Thanks, yes, the old code pulled it out of the header directly, but the rest of the story is that I save that cookie for later submittal