they say they have changed their minds - or that they
realize for the first time what their words implied -- we ignore them.
That's really out of order, morally, and probably legally, especially
when the images are personal and of no conceivable benefit to the
project.
munity than the
> courtesy removal would to the free culture community. And it looks terrible
> for us.
>
> Cary
Thanks, Cary. Given that the women are identifiable, haven't consented
to release, and the photograph was taken in a private place, why won't
an admin simp
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Lars Aronsson wrote:
> On 04/11/2012 06:45 AM, Sarah wrote:
>>
>> Can anyone point me to the basis of the claim that cc licences are
>> irrevocable? If someone were to upload an image to Flickr with a cc
>> non-commercial licence
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 1:54 AM, Benjamin Chen wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 11, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Sarah wrote:
>
> Can anyone point me to the basis of the claim that cc licences are
> irrevocable?
>
> http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Frequently_Asked_Questions#What_if_I_change_
rsonal images be
deleted (usually involving body parts that they uploaded when kids),
and being told no, too late, you can't change your mind. This seems
cruel and unreasonable, and so I'm wondering what the legal basis for
it is.
Sarah
__
I've never denied not being a Diva ;-)
-Sarah
On 5/17/2011 9:26 AM, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
--- On *Tue, 17/5/11, Craig Franklin //*wrote:
From: Craig Franklin
Subject: Re: [Commons-l] Fwd: [Gendergap] Photo of the Day on
Wikimedia Commons
To: "Wikimedia Commons Discu
questioned
by Wikipedians/medians around the world, is not worth the risk of losing
major donors - whether monetary or culturally.
Sarah
Am 17.05.2011 10:22, schrieb Gnangarra:
Is this picture worth more than 137,000 news images,
Is this picture worth the loss of xontributions from GLAM orga
From the Gendergap list, a really nice post, IMHO, from a newer female
user from Australia. Shared with permission.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Gendergap] [Commons-l] Fwd: Photo of the Day on Wikimedia
Commons
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 13:52:44 +1000
From:
Reply-To: I
ot; who have lifestyles some people here would not agree with that
make that drawing look tame.
But, I am happy to see this dialogue taking place, and happy that it has
triggered quality conversation on the original list I shared it on.
-Sarah
Sent via iPhone - I apologize in advance for my shor
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch>
--
Sarah Stierch Consulting
Historical, cultural & artistic research, advising & event planning.
--
http://www.sarahstierch.com/
___
Com
t_scope>pages.
#wikilove,
Sarah
--
Wikipedia Regional Ambassador, D.C. Region
Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American Art
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch>
--
Sarah Stierch Consulting
Historical, cultural & artis
' songs (purely on artistic merit); so with 50
people, achieving featured status shouldn't be too difficult.
Sounds awesome Andreas, let's start a WikiProject:Our Friends Lo-Fi Bands
=)
Punks not dead!
#wikilove,
Sarah
--
Wikipedia Regional Ambassador, D.C. Region
Wikipedi
an image to be
nominated as a featured image, then I guess I've been missing the goal
of Commons after all.
#wikilove,
Sarah
--
Wikipedia Regional Ambassador, D.C. Region
Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American Art
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch>
--
Sara
sn't pulled
out the "but...National Geographic..." card yet.
#wikilove,
Sarah
--
Wikipedia Regional Ambassador, D.C. Region
Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American Art
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch>
--
Sarah Stierch Consulting
Historical, cultural
On 5/16/2011 10:32 AM, Tobias Oelgarte wrote:
Reading the words of Sarah Stierch, someone could assume that a picture
of a naked male is fine. Do we get more female contributers by treating
them as some special, out of the oridinary? At the last meetings in
Germany i met several women, most
what is being utilized as a quality image to be used as an
example of /contemporary art/ then a large part of my cultural heart
just died.
This coming fro a man who has a St. Ex quote as his sig!
-Sarah
--
Wikipedia Regional Ambassador, D.C. Region
Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American
church/camp/after
school workshops/whatever' and all hell will break lose.
#wikilove,
Sarah
--
Wikipedia Regional Ambassador, D.C. Region
Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American Art
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch>
--
Sarah S
do with me being "sensitive to toplessness" -
you don't know anything about my lifestyle or character to assume that,
regardless of where I live or where I was born.
#wikilove,
Sarah
On 5/15/2011 10:53 PM, Aaron Adrignola wrote:
Commons is not censored. It's a beauti
On May 16, 2011, at 12:13 AM, Neil Kandalgaonkar wrote:
> I changed the picture. I'd like to note that I did this not owing to any
> 'authority' I might have as a WMF employee, just as a regular person
> associated with Commons.
+<3!!
-Sarah
Sent via iPhone - I
ocomotive%29> pictures on
Commons" and open up the Commons page to a big breasted CARTOON DRAWING
of an Asian woman, at a Children's Museum.
In the immortal world of outdated memes: "EPIC FAIL"
Sarah
Wikipedia Regional Ambassador, D.C. Region
Wikipedian-in-Residence, A
being
showcased do 'few wonders' for my efforts in regards to fighting the
uphill battle to show Wikipedia, Commons, etc. as reliable and quality
starting points for research, development and cultural dissemination.
#wikilove,
Sarah
On 5/15/2011 10:48 PM, Steven Walling wrote:
On Sun, Ma
21 matches
Mail list logo
